@Dusk_Foundation I used to think a thick Dusk book meant strong liquidity, but i’m less sure now.
My thesis is simple: Dusk token liquidity is better judged by recovery time after a large TRADE, not by DEPTH sitting there before it.
Around $0.0635 now, DUSK is moving inside roughly a $0.0636–$0.0683 daily range, which is wide enough to show real short-term stress.
One active market handled about 7.75M DUSK, near $506K, while aggregate 24-hour turnover is around $4.4M; those numbers don't match perfectly because liquidity is split across markets. 📉
If a large Dusk token sell moves price 3% but liquidity rebuilds in 90 seconds, thats different from the same move taking 20 minutes.
Visible orders can vanish. Refill speed is harder to fake.
So i’d watch how fast spreads, price and executable size normaliafter pressure, not how BIG the book looked before. 🔍
#dusk $DUSK $HEMI $BTW
My thesis is simple: Dusk token liquidity is better judged by recovery time after a large TRADE, not by DEPTH sitting there before it.
Around $0.0635 now, DUSK is moving inside roughly a $0.0636–$0.0683 daily range, which is wide enough to show real short-term stress.
One active market handled about 7.75M DUSK, near $506K, while aggregate 24-hour turnover is around $4.4M; those numbers don't match perfectly because liquidity is split across markets. 📉
If a large Dusk token sell moves price 3% but liquidity rebuilds in 90 seconds, thats different from the same move taking 20 minutes.
Visible orders can vanish. Refill speed is harder to fake.
So i’d watch how fast spreads, price and executable size normaliafter pressure, not how BIG the book looked before. 🔍
#dusk $DUSK $HEMI $BTW