🧩 Custody Isn't the Crypto Question - It's the Infrastructure One A payments company wants to add crypto rails - faster settlement, new markets, a stablecoin option customers keep asking for. What stalls the launch is a quieter question: will this still be compliant once it's live in five jurisdictions instead of one? 🤔 That's not really a crypto question - it's an infrastructure question. Custody, monitoring, and settlement all need to hold up to scrutiny at once, and most teams find out how hard that is only after legal asks where the assets actually sit and who can move them. Crypto-as-a-Service built on Fireblocks secures over $10 trillion in digital assets - the kind of scale that could come from surviving regulator scrutiny across many markets, not just handling volume. https://www.fireblocks.com/solutions/digital-asset-infrastructure?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=caas_dan&utm_campaign=post Tokenization support could mean deploying smart contracts across 35+ blockchains without building custody logic per chain, and payments orchestration could route stablecoin flows across 100+ countries through infrastructure designed for that footprint from the start. Whether the asset moving through it is $BTC , a stablecoin, or a tokenized instrument, the question stays the same: does the custody layer hold up under audit. 💡 That's what businesses are actually buying with this kind of CaaS - not just crypto access, but infrastructure built assuming regulators would look. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. DYOR before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#