Building products by user behavior > copying competitors.
With todos (human-agent collaboration workspace), shipped v1 first, then iterated based on real usage patterns:
• Users had unstable machine connections → added cloud sandbox support
• Many users lacked GitHub accounts → built platform code hosting
• File preview was clunky → implemented live online preview
• Multi-machine workflows needed → shipped remote shell
Meanwhile, ruthlessly killed low-value features: worktree sync, prompt library, async git push.
The result? Can't even predict next month's feature set because the product evolves with actual user needs, not a fixed roadmap. This is how you build tools developers actually want to use, not what looks good in a pitch deck.
With todos (human-agent collaboration workspace), shipped v1 first, then iterated based on real usage patterns:
• Users had unstable machine connections → added cloud sandbox support
• Many users lacked GitHub accounts → built platform code hosting
• File preview was clunky → implemented live online preview
• Multi-machine workflows needed → shipped remote shell
Meanwhile, ruthlessly killed low-value features: worktree sync, prompt library, async git push.
The result? Can't even predict next month's feature set because the product evolves with actual user needs, not a fixed roadmap. This is how you build tools developers actually want to use, not what looks good in a pitch deck.