Moving capital across several chains can look sophisticated, but wallet activity tells a more complicated story. Multi-chain users often interact with more protocols, rotate positions more frequently, and search for better yield opportunities. That does not automatically translate into higher returns. Bridge fees, gas, slippage, and wrapped-asset spreads can quietly consume the advantage before the capital even reaches its destination. The more interesting comparison is between how often capital moves and why it moves. A wallet that bridges every few weeks may generate plenty of activity while accumulating unnecessary route costs. A selective allocator making only a handful of well-timed moves can potentially keep more of the yield differential. There is also another route worth considering. Omniston, STON.fi ’s cross-chain execution layer, uses paired HTLCs and competing resolvers to facilitate cross-chain swaps without relying on a shared bridge contract or wrapped destination asset. That gives users access to supported networks while keeping the settlement structure fundamentally different from traditional bridging. For TON-native strategies, the equation is even simpler: staying within stonfi removes the cross-chain leg entirely. The lesson is straightforward: optimize the net return, not the number of chains in your wallet. #BTC Price Analysis# #BTC Above 60K# $BTC $ETH