#dusk $DUSK @Dusk This morning I opened the Git repo and the community and found these folks have come up with yet another new thing—Boreas was upgraded and just went live on the testnet, and immediately after that the community started messing with the OpenDusk governance voting, aiming to recover the burned block rewards and set up a community treasury. To be honest, looking at how frequently the code commits focus on DuskEVM bridging UX optimizations, the dev team clearly hasn’t been resting on their laurels, and I can’t really find fault with the pace of technical iteration.
But the more I look, the more I feel a huge contradiction lurking beneath it: the mainnet foundation is still being repaired and paved at full speed—cross-chain bridge user experience and virtual machine state management are being torn down and rebuilt repeatedly—yet the community and market excitement is being led astray by governance votes and long-term expectations. That sense of misalignment—“the underlying protocol is still pouring concrete while the upper-layer narrative is already running a marathon”—is exactly what makes me uneasy.
Take the recently talked-about OpenDusk governance treasury, for
But the more I look, the more I feel a huge contradiction lurking beneath it: the mainnet foundation is still being repaired and paved at full speed—cross-chain bridge user experience and virtual machine state management are being torn down and rebuilt repeatedly—yet the community and market excitement is being led astray by governance votes and long-term expectations. That sense of misalignment—“the underlying protocol is still pouring concrete while the upper-layer narrative is already running a marathon”—is exactly what makes me uneasy.
Take the recently talked-about OpenDusk governance treasury, for