I think many people don’t understand one thing. They believe that market makers and dog-themed bankroll operators push the price of “meme coins” because their costs are very high. In fact, a large amount of the chips (positions) are in the hands of the market maker. When there are fewer tokens in the market, the price will naturally rise. If you sell with your left hand and buy with your right, then you can pull the order book up. What you pay is only that little bit of slippage and trading fees. For example, #cys拉盘所付出的不过撑死二三百万u —this isn’t just about wash trading; it can also be used to open long positions and short positions, and the ones liquidated are the “fuel.” If shorts get liquidated, it requires buying to cover, which further pushes the price higher. A “darker” market maker will also widen the spread between spot and futures, and the funding rate can even trap those who short. Don’t short—it's all fuel.
#cys Don't go to the empty side. The dealer's pump costs are very low. You just need to pay the slippage. Once the price is at a high level and the dealer is controlling it, you can sell with your left hand and buy with your right hand to maintain the run. Most spot funds are already in the dealer's hands, so there's basically not much selling pressure.
Analysis of the impact of the failure of the US manufacturing repatriation, the debt crisis and the collapse of the US dollar credit on virtual currency
1. The transmission mechanism of the failure of manufacturing reshoring and the debt crisis 1. Structural barriers to manufacturing reshoring Trump's policy of repatriating manufacturing has run into trouble due to high labor costs in the United States (eight times that of Chinese workers and 15 times that of Vietnamese workers), supply chain disruptions (such as the delay of TSMC's US factory due to lack of supporting industries), and the crowding-out effect of financial capital on the real economy (78% of foreign investment flows to financial assets). This has prevented the United States from reducing its trade deficit through industrial revitalization. In the first quarter of 2025, the trade deficit with China was still as high as US$859.1 billion, the debt scale exceeded US$36 trillion, and the annual interest expenditure reached US$1.8 trillion.