蓝扣子Angel

$XAU current price: $4263.44, down slightly by 0.38% today. The 24h range is 4229.18–4289.29, with trading volume of 1.69 billion USDT. Trading activity in recent times has been sufficient.

Moving average status: EMA7=4252.27, EMA21=4196.43, EMA55=4133.57. The short-, mid-, and long-term moving averages are arranged from top to bottom in order, indicating a clear bullish trend. The current price is hovering close to the 7-period short-term moving average, showing a slight pullback/accumulation characteristic in the short term.

It’s like when we place an order for delivery and request a refund—you can’t possibly receive the payout immediately right after submitting the application! A lot of old-school friends misunderstand BABY being used as collateral and think it can be cashed out anytime. The biggest trap for everyone isn’t whether the returns are high or low; it’s that people don’t understand the real exit timing: the moment you click “redelegate” to the delegator, the tokens won’t instantly transfer to a transferable account!@BabylonLabs_io

With Babylon’s official staking/unstaking mechanism, the undelegation of a delegated position is split into three processes. First, the application gets queued into the current epoch queue. Then, once that cycle ends, the relevant data is written into the Bitcoin checkpoint. Finally, you still have to get through the confirmation period of 300 Bitcoin blocks. The official estimate for this duration is roughly fifty hours. Rumors that “after two days you can quickly unlock” are referring to a device/account settlement flow with many people’s prior conditions involved—this is absolutely not a “click once, the countdown starts, and the withdrawal button ends” kind of instant exit. One epoch corresponds to 360 blocks, about an hour in length. Whether you submit the request early or late will directly extend the overall waiting cycle.

That’s how you can tell why “fast unlocking” ≠ “no liquidity risk”! When the Bitcoin network is congested, block confirmation speed slows down. The time shown on the page is only an estimate; it doesn’t guarantee anything. Don’t just focus on the text “解除质押 (解除委托/unstake)” on the interface. The key is to verify three things: whether your application has entered the epoch processing stage; how many confirmations the Bitcoin checkpoint has accumulated; and when the tokens are truly unlocked and actually become transferable.

Also, don’t confuse two other types of risk: the time when undelegated funds actually arrive for the delegator; and the fact that penalties/forfeiture mechanisms are triggered only when validators double-sign. When choosing a validator partner, don’t just look at the commission ratio and estimated returns—stability and historical operational records are just as important!

Objectively speaking, BABY’s quick unbinding does address the pain point of long lockups in traditional PoS staking (over twenty days), but it is absolutely not an immediate redemption. In my hands-on follow-up, I’ll note three key timestamps: the time your undelegation enters the queue; the time the epoch is completed; and the time it takes for Bitcoin to confirm a full 300 blocks! If the actual credited amount is clearly beyond the two-day range, prioritize troubleshooting on-chain congestion and parameter changes first, and then reassess whether a “quick exit” is really reliable!
#baby $BABY

Everyone, don’t assume that once you lock BTC into a cold wallet, everything is all set. The other day, I was watching the news I saw on social media while eating dinner, and it nearly made my chopsticks slip right into your soup bowl—just like how, in our everyday routine, you lock up your house properly, only to discover there’s a flaw hidden inside the lock itself. @BabylonLabs_io

A well-known veteran company, Coldcard—hardcore hardware and a wallet—also suffered an incident. About 1,367 BTC were stolen, worth roughly $88 million at market price. After 4,585 emptied small addresses, the balances were essentially wiped to zero. Circle veterans and longtime players all recognize Coldcard as the “top-tier ceiling” of cold wallets: offline signing, open-source firmware, and physical experimental air-gapped network—security buffs are maxed out. For new devices, people often queue for months just to get them shipped, and scalpers can still resell quickly for around $2,000 to $3,000. Even seasoned Bitcoin players almost all have one.

But hackers exploited a firmware weakness to batch-guess keys, directly transferring the stolen bitcoins from users’ UTXOs. Even more frustrating: many victims went through the process without following any proper security practices—seed phrases and handwritten backups were stored incorrectly, private keys were never handled via proper screenshots (or rather, the point is they didn’t follow secure handling), they didn’t open or click phishing links, they didn’t keep too much on exchanges—basically all the usual safety measures were supposedly done right. And yet the coins were still stolen.

At this point, you have to look at Babylon as a solution. Its core logic is simple and easy to understand: keep Bitcoin in the main Bitcoin network throughout, so that the staking and lending business happens there. There’s no need to package and send it out as WBTC for third-party custody, no need to go through cross-region chain bridges and take on the risk of being breached by hackers, and no need to deposit into exchanges and face the potential risk of a platform rug-pull. Your BTC remains stored in your users’ native Taproot addresses. Using Shanghai native Bitcoin scripts to lock assets, once the staking period ends, it automatically unlocks and returns the funds.

When you inventory common issues in the ecosystem, the “coin-holding path” will automatically reveal hidden risks everywhere: depositing on exchanges means watching out for platform collapses and跑路 risks; using hardware wallets means guarding against underlying firmware vulnerabilities; wrapping into WBTC requires worrying about the custody provider’s credit; and cross-chain transfers have already seen billions of dollars in losses due to bridges being stolen in the past. Babylon doesn’t claim “zero risk.” But it steps outside the fixed mindset of “trusting third-party institutions.” Instead, it ties the security anchor to the total computing power of the entire Bitcoin network. Compared with traditional holding methods, it removes an entire layer of uncertainty introduced by human-driven processes.
#baby $BABY

Everyone who does business understands: sometimes it’s cheaper to spend money to take shortcuts and get around regulations and loopholes. It’s always the most cost-effective deal! Last night, I replayed and simulated the bribery model of Babylon Labs’ Contract Commission, and I directly found an outrageous vulnerability that can be used to obtain a seizure-and-forfeiture exemption outright. @BabylonLabs_io

You could say the Contract Commission is the fatal weakness in Babylon’s entire seizure-and-forfeiture fee mechanism—an Achilles’ heel in plain sight. It relies on M-of-N multisig technology to natively enforce contract constraints that Bitcoin’s script currently can’t handle. It looks like it perfectly fills the gap in the two public chains’ mechanisms, but it quietly leaves a knife-edge backdoor. If commission nodes simply refuse to sign, they can directly block the execution of the seizure-and-forfeiture process.

After I plugged the bribe costs into the game matrix for multi-scenario calculations, the conclusion became painfully realistic. For a blunt example: a validator staking 100 BTC, with principal worth a whopping $1.8 million. Once they do wrongdoing, all assets will be wiped to zero. Meanwhile, if they bribe the commission with just two or three (orders of magnitude) of the cost capital, it’s a no-lose operation.

By contrast, for the commission and the honest nodes that stick to the rules, there’s zero gain—no benefit at all. Take a bribe and you can walk away with millions. At most, the key point is that if they betray their own chain’s on-chain and off-chain commitments, no one will know—no on-chain punishment will ever be visible. This is a classic prisoner’s dilemma laid out right in front of you: nobody can truly stand firm against the test of money and temptation.

The only advantage solution within the current Babylon system is to wait for Bitcoin to go live on the mainnet, then activate the OP_CAT native contract’s proposal so that the contract commission can completely step aside. Until then, this really beautiful system’s defense has never been about hardcore cryptography alone—it’s about the morality, discipline, and resolve of the operators among dozens of master nodes. In the end, it’s about human nature, and human nature has never been able to withstand the ordeal of money and temptation! #baby $BABY

$SNDK why did I start getting obsessed with stockings lately? Unfortunately I’m too broke to afford them.
Is there any big brother who can sponsor me to get two pairs? $SNDK
Everyone, which of these two styles looks better?

$KORU Direxion MSCI Korea 3x Bullish ETF (Perpetual)
1. MACD (1 hour)
DIF: -0.20, DEA: -0.14, MACD: -0.06
DIF is still below the DEA, and the bearish structure has not reversed; however, the green bars continue to shrink, indicating that downside momentum is clearly weakening. Yet, no bullish crossover confirmation signal has appeared.

2. KDJ
K: 60.24, D: 45.27, J: 90.19
The J value is rising rapidly and is approaching the overbought zone. This is a rebound after a major drop, and there is short-term risk of pullback under pressure.

3. Trading volume
During the earlier phase of the sharp selloff, volume surged. In the rebound phase, volume has gradually declined, suggesting that the rebound lacks sustained inflow of incremental capital, so the durability of the rebound remains questionable.

Key price levels (summary)

🔴 Resistance levels (top to bottom)

1. First resistance: 15.42 (EMA21)

2. Second resistance: 15.49 (EMA55)

3. Strong resistance: the 16.00 range, with the upper high at 16.95

🟢 Support levels (top to bottom)

1. First support: 15.15 (EMA7)

2. Second support: 14.88 (recent rebound low)

3. Strong support: 13.56 (the lowest point of this round)

Alright guys! Today I’ll bring you some truly hardcore, high-value know-how from the crypto world!
When you usually team up with friends to pool money for a business, or set aside shared funds, the most annoying thing is when someone secretly pulls a stunt—steals the money and runs. Getting scammed doesn’t just hurt your funds; you also waste a whole bunch of time arguing and trying to claim your rights. It’s genuinely both costly and exhausting, and it’s so frustrating. But with Babylon Labs’ TBV trustless card—Bitcoin vault—this directly cures the cheating chaos of partner-based pooled saving! It builds a mechanism of bidirectional mutual constraints. Anyone who wants to game the system and act slick just has no way in! @BabylonLabs_io

In simple terms, when you and your partner set up the TBV vault together, both sides will connect in advance and sign off on all transaction paths. Each party also keeps their own exclusive “confusion method” as a control card. This mechanism is truly a cheat-detection nightmare! As long as nobody dares to forge a zero-knowledge proof to steal assets, the hidden “secret method” will automatically trigger. It exposes the cheater’s wrongdoing evidence to the entire network, with everything posted on-chain—fully and for good!

Now, is redemption actually smooth? Super smooth! As long as you submit a real, compliant on-chain proof—without any one being able to challenge it—once the time lock ends, the BTC will arrive automatically. No handling fees either. It’s hassle-free! If your partner doesn’t raise any challenge, you must present complete credentials to prove your innocence. If the other side finds any forged proof or fabrication, they won’t be able to activate the reserved secret method to invalidate your action. The harshest part is: no cheating means lifetime restrictions! After that, all vault permissions for anything linked to that counterparty are completely banned—there’s no comeback, no reversal.

On the other hand, traditional solutions are full of loopholes. Outdated DLCs can only prevent wrongdoing in one direction, making it easy to be absorbed and exploited by a malicious party to jam transactions. BitVM cross-chain bridges depend on imported multi-party endorsements—too many human factors involved, and the hidden “back-room” processes are inherently risky. Investments can fail; protection still isn’t foolproof. But TBV can do away with third-party custody entirely—asset class and permissions belong entirely to users, under your own control. By relying on some strict on-chain requirements and penalty rules that don’t just “limit” everyone else but instead stop cheating at the source, you can ensure that with Bitcoin: vaulting, lending, collateral, and trading all proceed safely and properly! #baby $BABY

Trading really is easy to get stuck in a rut. It’s like you watch the supermarket’s daily shipment numbers every day just to do the math! All you can think about is whether there’s too much inventory to sell, but you completely ignore one thing: how many people actually want to buy?

In that moment, I suddenly realized it instantly! When we trade in the crypto space, we keep fixating on the sell pressure that’s visible to the naked eye, while habitually ignoring the hidden, endogenous demand.

Actually, BABY has three extremely strong “must-have” spot-demand hold logic—nothing to do with pure speculation! @BabylonLabs_io
The first is BSN security rent. Major POS public chains need to use Bitcoin’s security services. They must pay BABY! This is the industry’s real essential utility—like water, electricity, and heating for infrastructure. It’s not about trading speculation. Each chain consumes hundreds of thousands of dollars per month; with multiple chains combined, large amounts of tokens are permanently withdrawn directly from the circulating supply.

Second is governance locking. Many early users, after unlocking, don’t dump to cash out—instead, they lock into governance contracts to gain influence, significantly reducing the amount of tokens circulating in the market.

Third is in-ecosystem circulation. The huge amount of tokens released by the ecosystem every month largely forms a closed-loop in things like purchases by me as a developer, services I provide, and cloud-service settlement. They won’t all get dumped into the secondary market.

Rough estimates suggest that nearly 50 million BABY per month are locked and consumed by the ecosystem, which dramatically reduces the actual sell pressure hitting the market.

Finally, I understand a true saying: supply is visible, but demand can’t be guessed. The sell pressure is like the surface-level reservoir outflow you can see, while the real demand is the underground current. If you only count sell pressure and not demand, the market picture will never be accurate.
#baby $BABY

In the crypto circle, what do Bitcoin “big brothers” do every day— is it just “hoarding coins” or “waiting for price increases”? This plot has been running for over a decade; even the “small investors” are tired of it. As “digital gold,” Bitcoin may be scarce, but before, it could only lie in your wallet and sleep. What’s the difference from locking a gold bar in a safe and letting it collect dust?
Luckily, Babylon comes in with its “TBV mechanism” to shake things up and rip up Bitcoin’s old script! Before, everyone only cared about “how high BTC can go.” Now people directly ask: “What can BTC actually do for you?” @BabylonLabs_io
With the Trustless vault model, Bitcoin finally doesn’t have to squeeze into cross-chain bridges anymore, and you don’t have to worry about others’ third-party custodians running off. Native BTC is locked up directly, and in one transformation it becomes a network-wide, general-purpose “working person” tool. It can not only provide security assurance as “guards” for various public chains, but also conveniently earn some extra income in lending and mining. This move literally pulls those idle, sleeping assets by the bedside back up!
To put it simply: just telling a story based on “scarcity” can only really fool veteran players. Trying to bring new folks into the game is too hard. But TBV turns Bitcoin into the “underlying security infrastructure” for the entire crypto ecosystem—and that opens up a whole new way of thinking immediately.
Sure, the project is still developing in the newbie village, and the real on-the-ground results need a little time—let the bullets fly for a bit. But this absolutely isn’t the most eye-catching stunt in recent years. Compared to staring at the candlestick chart and praying for new highs, the hard-core breakthrough that lets your Bitcoin truly “get to work” is the ultimate code to lift the whole industry!
#baby $BABY

$KORU is a US stock 3x leveraged ETF itself. It only seeks 3x daily returns. Over the long term, it will suffer leverage loss (compounding loss), so it is not suitable for long-term holding. In crypto, it’s further combined with perpetual contract leverage, which is effectively dual leverage. The Korean stock market itself often experiences violent volatility and triggers circuit breakers; once it starts falling, the drawdowns can be extremely frightening.

Market situation: In the short term, it has violently and continuously surged upward. All short-term indicators are completely overbought, and this is a overheated market.

◦ Strong short-term support: EMA7≈15.7; second support EMA21≈15.0

◦ The intraday high of 15.96 is a direct resistance level

• Current price: 15.87 USDT, 24-hour increase +23.50%; the spot KORU is rising in sync by 31.15%

• 24h range: 11.40–15.96; intraday volatility is huge. 24h trading volume: 2.167 billion USDT

• Moving averages: EMA7=15.70, EMA21=15.00, EMA55=13.90. Price is trading above all moving averages.

I almost got tricked into thinking “group-feast custody” was the way it works—I only realized what my previous understanding of TBV’s private vault was really wrong about, and I almost misread the position logic entirely!
At first, I naively thought it was just like an ordinary on-chain vault on the market: everyone throws all their BTC into one big public pool, with unified scheduling and collective operations to earn yield—classic “group-feast” mode in crypto.
It wasn’t until I actually dug into Babylon’s official documentation that I fully woke up! Turns out the whole architecture is fundamentally not the same thing as a mixed-pool model.
If we use a meal analogy: a regular vault is like everyone dumping their ingredients into one big pot—cooked together in a unified way—so if anything goes wrong, everyone suffers. But TBV is like each person having their own independent encrypted lockbox stall: your BTC is locked away by you, nobody else can touch it, and the platform can’t see the fine details of what your specific assets are.
The fatal flaw of traditional mixed pools is that the risk is more transferable—if the protocol has a bug or gets attacked by hackers, everyone can “collectively blow up,” leading to domino-style losses. This is the root cause of why so many DeFi vaults fail.
@BabylonLabs_io
But TBV uses user-specific script-locking: each user’s BTC assets are fully isolated and never interfere with one another. If a problem happens at a single point, it only affects the individual users involved—never “infects” the entire group of participants. The risk boundaries are effectively sealed off.
Another thing many people don’t understand is how TBV integrates with Aave and Gomining at the underlying level.
It connects to external protocols, but it’s never actual “native BTC funds” at the bottom layer. Instead, it locks your position and generates a credential (certificate) asset. Users participate in lending, mining, and other activities based on these credential assets to earn their share of the returns—meanwhile, the underlying native BTC stays safely and firmly locked in an isolated script and is never transferred out.
Even if the external lending protocols suffer extreme risk and users are harmed, what’s affected is only the yield at the credential layer—nothing can shake the security foundation of the underlying BTC.
This wrong assumption really gave me a hard lesson! In crypto investing, never start by looking at APR returns. Understand the logic of asset custody, the risk propagation, and the paths—because that’s the real core to keeping yourself safe.
#baby $BABY

The first time I saw the Babylon whitepaper 🤡, my brain was working incredibly simply! My whole mind was just calculating how much $BABY token I could farm by staking BTC—thinking of it as nothing more than an upgraded mining project. I was purely fixated on the annualized yield. The bigger the picture decided it—lock it in immediately! @BabylonLabs_io

Then I realized something: these past two days I’ve been bored out of my mind, so I re-read it again… and it just slapped me in the face! I was really too narrow-minded, ahhh!

Actually, your project isn’t “simple mining” at all!! It precisely nails every deadly pain point on newly born POS chains! When a new chain launches, it’s brutally tough 😭—market volatility goes wild, the staking liquidity in its own pool is thin to the point of absurdity, and in the “Matrix” scenario, hackers can just toss in some funds and launch a 51% attack.

To gather two staking users, the new chain can only endlessly mint and issue tokens as rewards—then inflation goes through the roof, the token price crashes even harder, and it becomes an endless death spiral with no way out!!

But Babylon’s wild move directly delivers a ✨god-tier solution✨! It simply doesn’t let the new chain strain itself—instead, it pulls the most reliable asset on the whole network, Bitcoin, and appoints it as the “security team captain”!

BTC holders—no need to thank me. Just follow the cross-chain mechanism. No need to worry about custody; I’m already gone. Just say that coins are locked on Bitcoin’s mainnet, and it can provide security endorsements for all kinds of external POS chains!

On one side, I stake $BABY to protect my own chain. On the other side, staking BTC to provide security and guard duty for external chains. Even though the two staking logics are completely different, most people still just rush in obsessing over APR—and can’t even be bothered to see and understand the underlying logic!

To put it plainly: #baby is building a super bridge for the crypto community!! Making Bitcoin no longer just digital corpse-gold that lies there—but directly upgrading it into the security regulatory foundation for the entire blockchain industry. Whether it will blow up in the future is a question, but the idea itself is just insanely brilliant!
Do you want me to further adjust the grammar and the level of explanation for the random symbols so my copy feels more casual and grounded? $BABY

Let me tell everyone the truth! Bitcoin’s real biggest problem is not its price going up and down! In my view, its most fatal shortcoming is that massive amounts of assets are just lying flat every day—doing absolutely nothing! Look at most of us: we treat BTC like a treasure, a family heirloom, and we hoard it without moving a single bit. Want it to participate in on-chain financial circulation? Oh boy, that’s even harder than teaching a kitten calculus! @BabylonLabs_io
Honestly! In the past, if we wanted BTC to actually play in DeFi and earn some yield, there was really no other way! We could only use old-school templates like WBTC and cbBTC to wrap tokens. To put it simply, it means handing your own native BTC to a custodial institution, and then swapping it for a fake “brand-new” identity to get into the market.

But I truly think! This is basically dancing in a minefield. Once your assets leave the native network, the three words “decentralization” become a joke. Every day you have to be on edge, praying the custodian won’t run off, and that the cross-chain bridge won’t be breached by hackers! Where is the “investment management” in that? It’s purely gambling on luck. One careless move, and your principal is gone.
Good news, though! Babylon is really that impressive! It directly overturns the outdated old model of traditional BTCFi. #baby
It leverages the BitVM3 architecture and zero-knowledge proof technology to literally fit Bitcoin with a powerful financial engine! The biggest thing I like is that it focuses on the real, original style. No wrapping, no custody, and no cross-chain relocation.
Our own BTC just stays safely on the Bitcoin mainnet, but! it can freely participate in every scenario—lending, derivatives, and liquidity mining. It’s seriously amazing! This basically fixes Bitcoin’s old problem of not being able to do native financial activities. The trillion-dollar sleeping assets are finally going to be activated! To be honest, the ecosystem’s core target, BABY, really is firmly riding the super boom of native BTCFi.
In the future, those centralized cross-chain models will all be phased out sooner or later—and BABY’s value potential is absolutely worth all of us eagerly anticipating!
Do you need me to help tweak it into a more explosive short-video narration rhythm, optimized for directly recording a video? $BABY

I really understand more and more as I watch! In everyday life, everyone knows this: when you use scissors to cut cloth, you don’t go and force it to chop wood! No matter how you use it, it feels extremely awkward. And the same goes for the crypto world—it's the same logic.

I’ve also noticed that many people have a misconception: they naively think that the mature DeFi playbook built on Ethereum can be directly copied and applied to Bitcoin. Then they could replicate a wave of benefits. But I want to tell everyone a fact—after researching for so long, I’m convinced this path is fundamentally a dead end.

In my view, Ethereum—since the day it was born—was made for on-chain finance. Liquidity pressure, borrowing, liquidations, dividends—all run automatically via smart contracts. The loop is complete, and the ecosystem is already mature. It really is smooth to play.

But Bitcoin’s underlying positioning is completely different. Honestly, I think its name and mission have only two things: ultimate security and ultimate store of value. It’s simply not meant for complex, high-frequency financial operations.

So I’ve always said that over the past more than ten years, all of BTCFi has been like pretending. Since native BTC can’t be used, people come up with WBTC, cross-chain mapping, multisig custody solutions. To put it plainly, in my opinion, 99% of the BTC finance out there isn’t actually dealing with “real” Bitcoin—it’s just a piece of paper a centralized institution issues as a receipt.

When a bridge goes dark, a platform blows up, or custody teams run away—then the ecosystem collapses in a domino effect. That’s a hard flaw that traditional BTCFi can never solve. I’ve seen too many market crashes caused by exactly this kind of panic.

It wasn’t until Babylon’s TBV permissionless custody vault came out that I truly saw the breakthrough—and finally broke the deadlock.

Let me be blunt! No packaging, no cross-chain, no handing it to a third party. Real native BTC stays on the Bitcoin mainnet, and you can directly provide liquidity, do borrowing, and conduct finance.

In my understanding, this is the industry’s first time enabling Bitcoin to upgrade from merely “lying there” as digital gold for store of value—into a top-tier financial asset that can actively generate yield, be reused, and be circulated.

I personally tested it on the testnet not long ago. To be honest, the technical architecture is taken to the max, but the product experience is really just so-so—it still needs to be refined slowly.

But it can be confirmed: in my view, native BTCFi is truly the next super main storyline for the coming bull cycle.
#baby $BABY @BabylonLabs_io

Buying groceries at the market in everyday life really gives you insight! The stall owners always put the most expensive, freshest “premium” vegetables right at the front—looking high-end and new. Who would’ve thought that the moment you weigh them, the water content is ridiculously high, the produce looks swollen and “pudgy,” and it’s simply not worth that price!

Take a look at the current scene in the circle now: the official hype is soaring to the skies, with speeches claiming that by the end of 2025, the scale will exceed $10 billion in USD—everyone’s supposedly tempted. But when people open DefiLlama, the real TVL is barely around three billion—so full of “water” you could almost drown in it!

Don’t just look at the locked-up data and think it’s beautiful—things are mixed in there. Testnet data, shell protocols, fake lockups—there’s a whole lot of that. Real “yield-bearing” assets with actual liquidity? Very few and far between!

It’s like Ledger, selling eight million hardware wallets. It looks like the entry is comprehensive, but when you open it, how many users really dare to stake the same cold-wallet BTC address on it for deposits, lending, and providing liquidity? Hardly any!

GoMining claims a scale of a thousand BTC—but all the press releases are plans, and actual delivery is nowhere in sight! Their fixed-rate products rumored to be integrated with Aave? They directly get pushed out to 2026—pure pie-in-the-sky!

Krakeno’s data and ecosystem rollout are all vague and unclear!

A truly beautiful ecosystem isn’t about stacking logos or collecting big-name partners and self-congratulating. Don’t keep showing off a “luxury lineup” next phase—show the truth, show the numbers!

What are the net inflows every day? What is the average daily amount of real borrowings and lending? What are the protocol’s real earnings?

The hype from big players and empty talk, versus real deployment that produces returns—there’s a whole market cycle of difference between them, all the way from bull to bear!
#baby $BABY @BabylonLabs_io

Learning

Look

Finally got to have a bite! $ETH

$ETH 现在格局不了一点，舔一口就跑！