I’ve noticed a pattern: the coins Sun Ge promotes are basically unrelated to the broader market.
When the market goes up, they go up even harder. When the market falls, they keep rising anyway—a full-on independent bull run.
$BTW 90 surged 21x in a day, $WIN tripled in two months, and $TRX has been slowly climbing for years and still hasn’t stopped.
Put simply: with Sun’s coins, just hold and go long—don’t be stupid and short them. They’re all being pumped endlessly. Every single one of them.
He’s the market maker himself; he doesn’t need a reason to pump the price. If you try to call the top, you’re going head-to-head with Sun Ge. Think you can outguess him? 😂
There were deeper forces behind last night's sharp sell-off; it was about much more than just the U.S. government selling BTC. The main catalyst was mounting pressure on U.S. liquidity, with reserves posting their steepest decline of the year. October is typically a period when U.S. Treasury funds are tight, and this year the situation has become even more acute. Without an influx of liquidity to support the market, buying power is naturally continuing to dry up.
Secondary factors shouldn't be overlooked either: with the midterm elections approaching, the market had already priced in related positive expectations, and the earlier rally had already delivered those gains. $80,000 is a key psychological level for bulls. A decisive break below it would open the door to a much deeper decline. But that also brings opportunity—this is the time to pick up coins at bargain prices. $BTC
Someone said they connected to free WiFi at Singapore airport, just for a few minutes, and 3.7 $BNB was transferred straight out of their wallet. The account hadn’t been active for months. Even CZ reposted it and asked, “Just connecting to WiFi wouldn’t be enough, right? Did something else happen in between?”
I’ll say it outright: this is pure hype. They’re desperate to make headlines.
The principle is simple: blockchain transactions work the same no matter what network you’re on. Your wallet’s private key signs the transaction locally, and then the signed transaction is broadcast. If you merely connect to WiFi, the network provider can only see your internet traffic. It can’t access the private key stored on your phone, let alone sign a transaction for you. Unless your phone already had malware installed, you’d previously clicked a phishing link and entered your seed phrase, or the wallet app itself was fake. In any of those three cases, your coins would be at risk whether or not you connected to that WiFi.
The timing is even more suspicious: “No transactions for months, then the moment they connect to WiFi, the coins are gone.” What are the odds? If airport WiFi could really steal crypto, Singapore airport would be hacker headquarters for the whole world, and CZ would’ve issued a security warning long ago.
And honestly, who goes out of their way to connect to airport WiFi that makes you go through a login page and approve a bunch of permissions? When I travel abroad, I just turn on roaming or buy a local SIM. Apart from looking up a map, I wouldn’t even open my wallet app on public WiFi.
So don’t get swept up in the hype. Most likely, they exposed their private key through their own mistake and are blaming the WiFi to get some attention.
What do you think? Would anyone really connect to free airport WiFi and then open their wallet?
I only just realized how ridiculous Binance’s notification settings are today. I have to rant about this.
Futures trade notifications are capped at 30 a day; spot trade notifications are also capped at 30 a day—and the kicker is, they share the same pool. Put together, that’s just 30 notifications a day.
I usually scalp, and I’m right there in the app watching the charts. Every market order I place triggers a push notification on my phone. I open and close positions dozens of times, and in less than half a day, I’ve completely used up my 30 notifications.
Here’s the worst part: once I’ve used them all, I get no notifications at all about whether the limit orders I placed that afternoon have been filled. By the time I remember to check, holy crap, they’ve already filled, and the price has moved way past where I wanted it.
Did they really design this without thinking? When I’m in the app placing trades, an in-app alert is enough. Why push notifications to my phone too? A trade should only trigger a notification when the app is in the background and I’m away from my phone. If you don’t separate online and offline situations and charge them to the same pool, aren’t you just wasting my notification quota?
Anyone else been burned by this? How did you deal with it—turn off notifications or change some other setting?
When looking to buy the dip, focus on altcoins that have undergone deep corrections, such as UNI, PONS, and ENA. Avoid short-term outperformers on the gainers list; once the broader market stabilizes, they’re likely to catch up on the downside 📉
The old logic: A sharp sell-off puts tokens to the test. If a token holds up while the broader market plunges, it means market makers are supporting its price, so you can hold it. This strategy worked very well during the market conditions in 2023 and the first half of 2024.
But the playbook has changed. Many tokens now hold their prices during a market crash, creating the illusion of support to lure buyers in. When the market recovers and other coins rebound, they start catching up on the downside. CRV and NEAR held up during the broader market’s earlier downturn, but eventually fell too.
Use the old strategy with caution now. The market is always changing, and our understanding needs to keep up. The only constant is change itself.
Maji Big Brother has really taken a brutal beating this time. His total position value plunged from $111 million to just $14.73 million.
BTC, HYPE, and PUMP have all disappeared. He probably closed them out or cut his losses. Now there’s only one ETH position left in his account, and he’s still stubbornly holding on.
Look at the ETH position data. The amount has shrunk from 39,000 ETH to just 6,100. It’s a 25x cross-margin position, opened at $2,624. It’s now down more than $1.27 million. The most outrageous part is the funding fees: he’s paid $1.34 million—more than the unrealized loss. The market is practically sucking him dry while he’s down on the ground.
The most dangerous part is the liquidation price: $2,380. Based on its current value, the market price is around $2,415, leaving just $35 between him and liquidation—not even 1.5% of room. One quick dip and this position is gone.
That huge $111 million long position has now been cut down to just over $10 million, and he’s still hanging on the edge of a cliff. The market has really taught him a harsh lesson this time. Now we’ll just have to see if those last 6,100 ETH can survive this fight for their lives.
So strong… it’s still pumping while the overall market is getting crushed and falling hard, yet this one is still rising.
I just took a quick look at the order book: today $BTC was dumped from 83,300 down to 80,600—down nearly 3%. $ETH was even worse, straight down 5%. In the group chat it’s one wave of misery. But then $OGN went the other way, climbing +110%: in the past 24h it surged from 0.022 to 0.046, with a peak touch at 0.0507. It pulled in about 620 million U in 24h trading volume.
Why is it so hard to break? I dug into the logic—this isn’t just some pure market-maker pumping:
Over at Origin, 100% of the protocol net fees (the stablecoin revenues earned from OETH, Super OETH, OUSD, etc.) are used to buy back OGN on the secondary market. Cumulatively, they’ve already repurchased 114 million OGN, accounting for over 15% of the circulating supply—meaning the team is putting real money back under the floor.
In August, the xOGN new tokenomics passed governance: 50% of protocol revenue is paid directly to stakers, and the other 50% continues to be used for buybacks. Now nearly half of the circulating supply is effectively locked into xOGN. That means there aren’t many “sellable” float shares left for people to dump.
On top of that, just this week they launched a public buyback dashboard. Every buyback transaction can be tracked on-chain—transparency is maxed out, and the whales started accumulating.
Technically, the short positions were already heavily pressed. Once they pulled it up, it triggered a cascade of short-liquidations plus momentum bots chasing longs. Retail FOMO followed in, and with a low float in a small cap, it basically flew.
That said, seriously: the 15-minute chart already shows a long upper wick. The long/short ratio is 59:41. Brothers who are chasing—keep your position light. Don’t let one “needle” bury you at the top.
Are you on the train, or under the train? Drop a comment and check in.
Today the broader market is down like a dog, and in my watchlist, $RLC is pulling against the trend—up 30% in the last 24 hours, current price 0.87.
This kind of move really says a lot—when the broader market collapses, it doesn’t follow; instead it volume-pushes upward. That suggests the money inside is determined to play this wave, not just going along with the market.
I just added a bit more, betting it can break through the previous high at 1.07. I’ll place the stop-loss at 0.78. If it breaks, I’ll leave—no stubborn holding.
In 7 days it’s already up 140%, and over 30 days it’s close to 180%. Once the trend really starts with a stock like this, the shakeout can be brutal—if you can’t hold, you’ll get thrown off the train.
Brothers, what do you think? Is this a real breakout, or is it using the market’s drop to quietly unload? Let’s chat in the comments.
The U.S. government has moved $1 billion worth of Bitcoin—could this be the cause of this round of selloff? Weren’t they saying they wouldn’t sell? Don’t they have a negative view of crypto?
I’m relying on $STRK —this wave is really crazy. In 24 hours it surged 24% straight: from 0.048 up to a needle-poke high of 0.0625, and now it’s back around 0.06.
I just pulled up Binance data and found it interesting: on the retail side, 60% are directly in shorting—while the overall long/short ratio across the whole market is only 1.4, a typical case of short crowding. But on the large-holder side, the long/short position ratio dropped from 2.0 that I saw when I checked, all the way down to 1.55; and the account long/short ratio fell from 1.77 to 1.48—main force “pulling up and distributing” at the same time, with retail below picking up short orders.
The funding rate is only 0.000003—almost zero. Longs aren’t crowded at all. This move isn’t pumped up by crowded perps; it’s real spot demand being eaten by actual people. In the past 24h, perp trading volume was 126 million U, with volume nearly 10x compared to the previous few days. From the July low of 0.022 to now 0.06—within three months it’s almost tripled. MA7 has curled up to 0.0528, and the long-side alignment has just started to form.
Let me talk about my own plan: don’t chase highs. 0.0625 was the just-made high. Tonight at midnight, funding fee settlement is coming—most likely there will be a wick/needle jab shakeout. If you have positions, reduce a portion around 0.062 first. Then if it retraces to 0.053–0.055 (near MA7) and doesn’t break, you can re-enter.
For brothers holding shorts—stay calm. With 60% of retail already shorting, shorting against the trend at this level is basically handing ammo to the main force.
Do you think this wave can push back to the prior high of 0.063, or will it turn and dip once more? Drop your position in the comments.
Jeff Yan, the founder of Hyperliquid, is 31 years old this year and a billionaire.
But just looking at the person, you would never guess he’s wealthy. He dresses no differently from passersby; the only show of status is the group of bodyguards behind him.
In 2019, he was still renting a place in Puerto Rico, paying less than $2,000 a month. He started quantitative trading with $10,000—he even couldn’t bring himself to buy a monitor. Instead, his computer was directly connected to the TV.
After he made money, he built Hyperliquid. No VC, no outside investors—only his own money, his brain, and his obsession with the idea.
In 2024 it got even crazier: he directly distributed 31% of HYPE to users, which at the time was worth $1.2 billion. Not a single token was sold to institutions.
$10,000, a rented apartment, five years—billionaire. All achieved before he turned 31.
What’s going on? Originally, on November 18th, Trump was scheduled to come to Shenzhen to attend APEC. But now they’re saying it’ll be an online meeting instead!! Why is that? Anyone know? Feels like something big is about to happen
That buddy, man, is going in again and turning a profit into losses this round—he really doesn’t know when to take profit. He only ever goes to liquidation or stops out. Does he really have money he can’t run out of?!
Looked at this address: 1.1 million BTC, worth $93 billion, lying on-chain for almost 16 years without moving.
Honestly, this guy might be the richest poor person in the world. On paper, he has over $90 billion—but he can’t spend a single cent. Not because he doesn’t want to, but because he doesn’t dare.
Think about it: if Satoshi actually moved even one BTC, the entire crypto world would go berserk.
The first reaction in the market would definitely be: he’s running. With $93 billion dropping on the table, wouldn’t BTC instantly drop—at least down by half? Then everyone would start guessing: is he dead? Has someone found the private key? Or is this address just a scam from the start? The myth of Bitcoin—“decentralized, no one controls it”—would immediately collapse by half on the spot.
What’s even more interesting is who he really is. A Japanese person? An Australian scholar? A bunch of crypto punks? Or some experiment product allegedly raised by the NSA? Guessing for more than a decade, and still no solid answer. Some say he’s been dead for ages; others say he’s hiding away in some small place, watching the monster he created keep growing and growing.
Anyway, I think he’d better never move. If he doesn’t, Bitcoin is faith. If he does, then faith has to be revalued all over again.
Do you think Satoshi is still alive? If he really stepped forward, what would his first sentence be?