Home
Notification
Profile
Trending Articles
News
Bookmarked and Liked
Creator Center
Settings
LIVE
Uncle Mose
--
Bearish
Follow
$NOT
looks like it will breakdown to 0.014
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.
See T&Cs.
NOT
0.007896
-3.63%
882
0
Replies
0
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sign Up
Login
Relevant Creator
LIVE
Uncle Mose
@unclemose74
Follow
Explore More From Creator
$TON A message by Durev ❤️ Thanks everyone for your support and love! Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram. This was surprising for several reasons: 1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU address for law enforcement”. 2. The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France. 3. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools. Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. We’ve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But we’ve always been open to dialogue. Sometimes we can’t agree with a country’s regulator on the right balance between privacy and security. In those cases, we are ready to leave that country.
--
Yes is time to hope in and make profit on $NOT now before is too late
--
$NOT I'm really disappointed in Notcoin this circle I expect more than that shitty performance
--
$NOT volume is too low but the price is ok think
--
$BTC to 64k
--
Latest News
Nansen CEO Comments on Ethereum Community Dynamics
--
Cryptocurrency Market Sees $45.55 Million in Liquidations Over Four Hours
--
China Plans More Aggressive Fiscal Policy For Next Year
--
Bitcoin's Security Unlikely To Be Compromised By Quantum Computers This Decade
--
DeFi Market Trends Indicate Potential Super Cycle, Says DeFinance Capital Founder
--
View More
Trending Articles
🚨 BREAKING: Michael Saylor's Shocking Response on $XRP! 🤯
simple simon the profiler
$SHIB Will Hit $1 or $0.01?
TheMahins
Elon Musk vs. SEC: The 48-Hour Showdown Continues 🚨
Kiyyan Trader
$USUAL Types of Usual Investors: Many will sell at 0.78-0.82
ZZ19
I Sold ALL My $BTC at $100K—What Happens Next Will Shock You
Valueobtain
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs
