#黄仁勋刚辞职美媒就给中国扣帽子
Huang had barely resigned when Bloomberg came out with an article titled “China Is the Biggest Loser.” They must’ve written it in advance, just waiting for him to leave so they could pin the blame on China.
First, let’s get clear on who forced Huang out. Those hawks on Capitol Hill used an unsubstantiated “spy” rumor to purge someone who had long argued for selling chips to China. Washington pulled the trigger, but we’re the ones getting blamed. What kind of gangster logic is that?
And whether “China lost” is not for you to dictate. Bloomberg’s logic is that Huang meant China could still buy some Nvidia chips and “hang in there,” but now that he’s gone, it’s all over. They’ve got it exactly backwards. As long as there’s still a way to buy, domestic buyers have a fallback, and homegrown chips will forever be treated as “backups to test out eventually.” Shut that window, and there’s no fallback left. Buyers have only one option: bite the bullet and go domestic. In the first half of 2026, Nvidia’s share of China’s AI chip market had already fallen to 34%, with Huawei Ascend just six percentage points behind. And that happened while China could “still buy.” If the supply channels are really cut off, who’s going to panic?
This US media script of “when in doubt, blame China” has played out from the subprime mortgage crisis to the yen’s depreciation. Every time, it’s “China will lose,” and every time, they get proven wrong. Huang has an Asian face, so they shove him into the “spy narrative” pipeline, even turning personal scandals into “Chinese infiltration.” The hat-making factory is open for business, and they can’t even be bothered to change the script. Bloomberg must have 💩 for brains to say this~
$NVDAB
Huang had barely resigned when Bloomberg came out with an article titled “China Is the Biggest Loser.” They must’ve written it in advance, just waiting for him to leave so they could pin the blame on China.
First, let’s get clear on who forced Huang out. Those hawks on Capitol Hill used an unsubstantiated “spy” rumor to purge someone who had long argued for selling chips to China. Washington pulled the trigger, but we’re the ones getting blamed. What kind of gangster logic is that?
And whether “China lost” is not for you to dictate. Bloomberg’s logic is that Huang meant China could still buy some Nvidia chips and “hang in there,” but now that he’s gone, it’s all over. They’ve got it exactly backwards. As long as there’s still a way to buy, domestic buyers have a fallback, and homegrown chips will forever be treated as “backups to test out eventually.” Shut that window, and there’s no fallback left. Buyers have only one option: bite the bullet and go domestic. In the first half of 2026, Nvidia’s share of China’s AI chip market had already fallen to 34%, with Huawei Ascend just six percentage points behind. And that happened while China could “still buy.” If the supply channels are really cut off, who’s going to panic?
This US media script of “when in doubt, blame China” has played out from the subprime mortgage crisis to the yen’s depreciation. Every time, it’s “China will lose,” and every time, they get proven wrong. Huang has an Asian face, so they shove him into the “spy narrative” pipeline, even turning personal scandals into “Chinese infiltration.” The hat-making factory is open for business, and they can’t even be bothered to change the script. Bloomberg must have 💩 for brains to say this~
$NVDAB