Was trying to work out how a smart contract would even ask a question like "which wallets in this pool hold more than $1,000", and realised it basically can't. There's no query language onchain.
That's the gap @SpaceandTime is going after. You run the query in SQL, and Proof of SQL generates a zero-knowledge proof that it ran correctly over tamper-proof data. So the result is something a contract can verify, not just trust.
That matters in three places: AI agents checking verified data before they act, tokenization where offchain data like reserves needs to be anchored, and DeFi where lending or vault decisions depend on accurate numbers.
The honest catch: a proof shows the query ran correctly, not that the data going in was good. And real usage still looks small next to the token's size, with $SXT around $0.01 and up roughly 7% today.
If the proof only covers the query and not the source data, where does the trust actually move to?
#sxt
That's the gap @SpaceandTime is going after. You run the query in SQL, and Proof of SQL generates a zero-knowledge proof that it ran correctly over tamper-proof data. So the result is something a contract can verify, not just trust.
That matters in three places: AI agents checking verified data before they act, tokenization where offchain data like reserves needs to be anchored, and DeFi where lending or vault decisions depend on accurate numbers.
The honest catch: a proof shows the query ran correctly, not that the data going in was good. And real usage still looks small next to the token's size, with $SXT around $0.01 and up roughly 7% today.
If the proof only covers the query and not the source data, where does the trust actually move to?
#sxt
