$UAI Daily trading volume of $21.6 million, but only $360,000 can be found on-chain. Where did the other $21.24 million go?
UAI took a pretty hard hit today. It’s currently around $0.0476, down a little over 40% in a day. When I wrote about it three days ago, it was still at $0.10—which means it’s more than halved in just three days. The prices match across both platforms: Ave lists it at $0.0476, DexScreener at $0.04767. Their 24-hour losses are -41% and -40.6%, respectively—basically the same figure.
The volume figures don’t match. Ave’s rankings show UAI doing $21.6 million in a day across 226,000 trades: 122,000 buys and 104,000 sells. The dollar amounts on each side are both around $10.8 million, leaving net buying at just negative $20,000. I searched this contract all over DexScreener. Across all 10 pools, 24-hour volume adds up to $360,000 from 5,688 trades, with total liquidity of $8,546. $21.6 million divided by $360,000 is 60 times; 226,000 trades divided by 5,688 is 40 times.
The pools don’t match either. Ave lists the main pool as UAI/$BNB , with $308,000 in pool funds, down from $455,000 three days ago—a drop of more than 30%. On DexScreener, UAI has only one WBNB pool, on SushiSwap, with $2 in liquidity and zero 24-hour volume. That $308,000 main pool can’t be matched on-chain.
Ave doesn’t even agree with itself. On the same details page, the top 10 holders’ share is listed as three different numbers in three places: 26% in the basic information section, 91.1% in the AI detection section, and 99.1% for the Top 100 on the holders page. I checked the turnover rate twice and got 45.2% once and 37.3% the other time, even though volume divided by market cap is clearly still around 45%.
A bit of background: this coin’s supply is already tightly held. The top three holders are three anonymous wallets, accounting for 55.7%. I covered that in my post three days ago; it’s nothing new today. In a simulated sell across 37 wallets, 11 failed, with a note saying some users may be blacklisted. That figure comes from Ave alone—make of it what you will.
I’m not drawing any conclusions here, just suggesting one way to check: don’t take the trading volume on a rankings page at face value. Search the contract on DexScreener and check that the pools, volume, and trade count all line up before deciding. If Ave clarifies what this 60x gap means—whether it’s platform volume or on-chain volume—I’ll come back with an update. If you hold UAI, search for the contract starting with 0x3e5d on DexScreener and take a look for yourself. Don’t just rely on that $21.6 million figure on the rankings page.
Risk disclaimer as always: Alpha coins are volatile, pools are shallow, and trading slippage is high. The figures above are only what I found at the time of checking today. DYOR, and don’t get carried away. Follow me, and see you tomorrow for the ledger.
$UAI $BNB
#BinanceAlpha #UAI #ConflictingMetrics
UAI took a pretty hard hit today. It’s currently around $0.0476, down a little over 40% in a day. When I wrote about it three days ago, it was still at $0.10—which means it’s more than halved in just three days. The prices match across both platforms: Ave lists it at $0.0476, DexScreener at $0.04767. Their 24-hour losses are -41% and -40.6%, respectively—basically the same figure.
The volume figures don’t match. Ave’s rankings show UAI doing $21.6 million in a day across 226,000 trades: 122,000 buys and 104,000 sells. The dollar amounts on each side are both around $10.8 million, leaving net buying at just negative $20,000. I searched this contract all over DexScreener. Across all 10 pools, 24-hour volume adds up to $360,000 from 5,688 trades, with total liquidity of $8,546. $21.6 million divided by $360,000 is 60 times; 226,000 trades divided by 5,688 is 40 times.
The pools don’t match either. Ave lists the main pool as UAI/$BNB , with $308,000 in pool funds, down from $455,000 three days ago—a drop of more than 30%. On DexScreener, UAI has only one WBNB pool, on SushiSwap, with $2 in liquidity and zero 24-hour volume. That $308,000 main pool can’t be matched on-chain.
Ave doesn’t even agree with itself. On the same details page, the top 10 holders’ share is listed as three different numbers in three places: 26% in the basic information section, 91.1% in the AI detection section, and 99.1% for the Top 100 on the holders page. I checked the turnover rate twice and got 45.2% once and 37.3% the other time, even though volume divided by market cap is clearly still around 45%.
A bit of background: this coin’s supply is already tightly held. The top three holders are three anonymous wallets, accounting for 55.7%. I covered that in my post three days ago; it’s nothing new today. In a simulated sell across 37 wallets, 11 failed, with a note saying some users may be blacklisted. That figure comes from Ave alone—make of it what you will.
I’m not drawing any conclusions here, just suggesting one way to check: don’t take the trading volume on a rankings page at face value. Search the contract on DexScreener and check that the pools, volume, and trade count all line up before deciding. If Ave clarifies what this 60x gap means—whether it’s platform volume or on-chain volume—I’ll come back with an update. If you hold UAI, search for the contract starting with 0x3e5d on DexScreener and take a look for yourself. Don’t just rely on that $21.6 million figure on the rankings page.
Risk disclaimer as always: Alpha coins are volatile, pools are shallow, and trading slippage is high. The figures above are only what I found at the time of checking today. DYOR, and don’t get carried away. Follow me, and see you tomorrow for the ledger.
$UAI $BNB
#BinanceAlpha #UAI #ConflictingMetrics
