CZ reposted an analysis, calling it “another attack against Binance.”

Odaily News reported that CZ reposted a lengthy analysis of public opinion surrounding Binance. The analysis found that over approximately 78 hours, from October 30 to November 2, 1,083 accounts published 11,700 hostile posts about the Binance hack, generating around 20.93 million impressions. Of these, 3,354 posts were identified as misinformation.

· The analysis also said that 452 of the 641 most active accounts were linked through coordinated activity; 89% of the accounts rarely mentioned Binance under normal circumstances, but their posting frequency during the incident reached 24.6 times the baseline.
· During the phase when Binance resumed withdrawals, calls to “withdraw immediately” and “join the bank run” peaked at 11.2 posts per hour, the highest rate across all phases.

The account links and misinformation assessments above come from the analysis; CZ characterized it as “another attack.”

When assessing coordinated public opinion, would you look first at accounts’ posting histories or the distribution of their posting times?