Arbitrum Council Moves $30M in Binance Hack Funds Again

Arbitrum's security council rewrote a contract to move $30 million linked to the Binance hack, without holding the hacker's key, the second such intervention this year.

If a council can rewrite a contract to recover stolen funds, what stops the same power from being used, intentionally or not, against legitimate users? Arbitrum's second intervention this year raises a question for Ethereum's whole rollup ecosystem: how much emergency control is acceptable before a network stops being decentralized in practice, even while it remains decentralized on paper?

https://www.bonuz.xyz/en/blog/arbitrum-council-moves-30m-binance-hack-funds-2026-11-03