#BTC What do you think of this theory...
Post
Golos Baffeta
·
--
While all the noise is going on about the constant hacks, I decided to take a careful look at it all from a different angle, and also forcibly worked liquidity figures into my usual indicator—and saw something interesting.
And then almost the entire volume structure suddenly changed, so I started thinking that, in theory, they want to confuse us all even more than we’re already expecting here.
So, an interesting picture emerged: the main bottom at $BTC lit up at 55-45 thousand by the end of the year, which is below my main forecast, where I once gave 58-65 and later revised it to 70-60.
Moving on, with this scenario (55-45), the next target will be 90+- and then we’ll drop back (!) to 65+-; only from there will we go on to hit 140, but not in 2027 anymore—apparently in 2028.
In short: by the end of this year, we could see 55-45, then 90, then 65, and only after that 140-180.
And one last thing…
This will be Bitcoin’s last big wave, which will ultimately send it into a long downtrend, with figures of 30-20-10.
Keep this whole scenario in mind; this is actually an important mathematical nuance that emerged thanks to all these circumstances surrounding the hacks.
We’ll see 🤝
And then almost the entire volume structure suddenly changed, so I started thinking that, in theory, they want to confuse us all even more than we’re already expecting here.
So, an interesting picture emerged: the main bottom at $BTC lit up at 55-45 thousand by the end of the year, which is below my main forecast, where I once gave 58-65 and later revised it to 70-60.
Moving on, with this scenario (55-45), the next target will be 90+- and then we’ll drop back (!) to 65+-; only from there will we go on to hit 140, but not in 2027 anymore—apparently in 2028.
In short: by the end of this year, we could see 55-45, then 90, then 65, and only after that 140-180.
And one last thing…
This will be Bitcoin’s last big wave, which will ultimately send it into a long downtrend, with figures of 30-20-10.
Keep this whole scenario in mind; this is actually an important mathematical nuance that emerged thanks to all these circumstances surrounding the hacks.
We’ll see 🤝
