In the same MEME community, does voting always mean “one person, one vote”?
$SHIB The official Doggy DAOs documentation lists four voting strategies: voting power weighted by token holdings, veToken voting power linked to lockup duration, identity-based voting, and quadratic voting weighted by the square root of the number of tokens held. Proposals can choose different strategies, so you can’t just look at the “approval rate” and conclude that the whole community has reached consensus.
It’s also worth discussing what problem the rules are meant to address.
For example, choosing a theme for a community event and deciding how to spend a pool of funds may call for different considerations: the former aims to understand participants’ preferences, while the latter also involves responsibility for the funds. The specific rules should be made clear before voting—not debated after the results are in, over whose voice counts.
I’d first look for three things: who’s eligible to vote, how each vote is counted, and what it takes for a proposal to pass. Official documentation describes the design; it doesn’t replace checking the specific proposal, nor does it justify drawing conclusions about SHIB’s price.
Which decisions do you think are right for one-person-one-vote in a MEME community, and which should take token holdings into account?
$SHIB #MEME #CommunityGovernance
$SHIB The official Doggy DAOs documentation lists four voting strategies: voting power weighted by token holdings, veToken voting power linked to lockup duration, identity-based voting, and quadratic voting weighted by the square root of the number of tokens held. Proposals can choose different strategies, so you can’t just look at the “approval rate” and conclude that the whole community has reached consensus.
It’s also worth discussing what problem the rules are meant to address.
For example, choosing a theme for a community event and deciding how to spend a pool of funds may call for different considerations: the former aims to understand participants’ preferences, while the latter also involves responsibility for the funds. The specific rules should be made clear before voting—not debated after the results are in, over whose voice counts.
I’d first look for three things: who’s eligible to vote, how each vote is counted, and what it takes for a proposal to pass. Official documentation describes the design; it doesn’t replace checking the specific proposal, nor does it justify drawing conclusions about SHIB’s price.
Which decisions do you think are right for one-person-one-vote in a MEME community, and which should take token holdings into account?
$SHIB #MEME #CommunityGovernance
