š¦ Bloomberg sent a signal today (10/28): Solana wants to ākickā its dependence on the Meme casino and turn to knock on Wall Streetās doorāthis may be the most underrated āupstream variableā in the Meme ecosystem.
According to Bloomberg, institutions including JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Standard Chartered, as well as payment networks such as Visa and Fiserv, are already conducting stablecoin- and tokenized-asset-related business on Solana. Solana is trying to shift its growth model from ācollecting rent from Meme speculationā to āinstitutional-grade financial applications.ā
But the market isnāt buying it just yet. A few figures tell the story honestly:
Ā· SOL is down about 20% year to date;
Ā· U.S.-listed spot/staking SOL ETFs have seen net outflows for two straight weeks this month, totaling about $50 million;
Ā· Solanaās share of on-chain perpetual futures trading volume has fallen from 17% to 6%.
My take: At its core, this is a change in what anchors SOLās value. In the past, SOLās valuation was anchored largely to Meme trading activity and fee revenue; now it wants to shift that anchor to āstablecoin issuance + institutional capital + tokenized assets.ā Changing the anchor is a more stable long-term direction (upstream liquidity doesnāt depend on sentiment), but in the short term, the market is still valuing it through the old Meme narrative. So SOL is weak, ETFs are seeing outflows, and its share of trading volume is fallingāāgrowing painsā and ānarrative losing steamā are happening at the same time.
Three things are worth watching next: whether SOL ETF flows can stop declining, the amount of stablecoins issued on-chain, and whether institutional business leads to tangible, āvisibleā results. Whether institutions moving on-chain means real money or just PR talkāthese two figures will tell us.
What do you think of Solanaās move to āde-Memeā itself? Is it a proactive upgrade, or a forced retreat? š¤
#Binance #Solana #MemeCoin (For observation, not investment advice)
According to Bloomberg, institutions including JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Standard Chartered, as well as payment networks such as Visa and Fiserv, are already conducting stablecoin- and tokenized-asset-related business on Solana. Solana is trying to shift its growth model from ācollecting rent from Meme speculationā to āinstitutional-grade financial applications.ā
But the market isnāt buying it just yet. A few figures tell the story honestly:
Ā· SOL is down about 20% year to date;
Ā· U.S.-listed spot/staking SOL ETFs have seen net outflows for two straight weeks this month, totaling about $50 million;
Ā· Solanaās share of on-chain perpetual futures trading volume has fallen from 17% to 6%.
My take: At its core, this is a change in what anchors SOLās value. In the past, SOLās valuation was anchored largely to Meme trading activity and fee revenue; now it wants to shift that anchor to āstablecoin issuance + institutional capital + tokenized assets.ā Changing the anchor is a more stable long-term direction (upstream liquidity doesnāt depend on sentiment), but in the short term, the market is still valuing it through the old Meme narrative. So SOL is weak, ETFs are seeing outflows, and its share of trading volume is fallingāāgrowing painsā and ānarrative losing steamā are happening at the same time.
Three things are worth watching next: whether SOL ETF flows can stop declining, the amount of stablecoins issued on-chain, and whether institutional business leads to tangible, āvisibleā results. Whether institutions moving on-chain means real money or just PR talkāthese two figures will tell us.
What do you think of Solanaās move to āde-Memeā itself? Is it a proactive upgrade, or a forced retreat? š¤
#Binance #Solana #MemeCoin (For observation, not investment advice)