Looking at BTC’s price over the past 24 hours, I’d first separate price from the flow of funds: rolling 24 hours, $BTC +1.11%. This indicates that the spot price is up compared with 24 hours ago. The gain alone cannot tell us where the buying came from, much less let us infer ETF or institutional fund flows. Price changes, holdings at a given point in time, and net flows over a statistical window are three different measures.

On October 28, 2026, Jinse Finance reported that the Dutch central bank had published statistics on residents’ crypto-asset holdings for the first time: as of the end of June 2026, Dutch households held approximately €3.2 billion in crypto assets through domestic crypto-asset service providers, including bitcoin holdings worth approximately €1.5 billion. These are euro valuations at a specific point in time—not new purchases in October or net inflows over a period. The report did not provide the corresponding BTC quantity.

These figures also have clear limitations: they exclude overseas platforms, personally self-custodied wallets, and indirect crypto investments, so they do not represent Dutch residents’ total crypto-asset holdings. Specific amounts do not mean comprehensive coverage; holdings recorded by domestic service providers cannot be extrapolated to claim that residents as a whole are adding to their positions.

So this statistic does not explain the price movement over the past 24 hours. I’ll continue checking net-flow data with consistent definitions and continuous time coverage, while keeping an eye on the scope, units, and time windows used. What we can confirm for now is that BTC’s price has risen, and that there is a historical holdings statistic with limited scope. There isn’t enough evidence to link the two causally.