$Q has plunged from $0.09 to $0.06, down 26.11% in 24 hours, while trading volume surged to $141M. I’ve been watching on-chain activity and spotted a signal others have overlooked: in the two hours before the crash, several newly deployed contract addresses made staggered buys of Q on decentralized exchanges. None of the individual trades were large, but the transaction paths were strikingly similar—first out of a mixer, then through two layers of intermediary wallets, and finally placing buy orders in Q’s liquidity pools. This isn’t retail buying the dip; someone is using “distributed accumulation” to disguise the actions of a single entity. There’s another, more direct signal: Q inflows to exchange deposit addresses plunged after the price broke below $0.065, while outflows from withdrawal addresses edged up. That suggests the selling pressure mainly came from leveraged liquidations on exchanges, rather than whales moving tokens onto exchanges to sell. My read is that this downturn looks more like a liquidity squeeze than a collapse in fundamentals. There’s money quietly buying around $0.06, but in a disciplined way: no chasing the price, just placing limit orders. If net outflows from withdrawal addresses continue over the next 48 hours, while the new contract addresses keep buying at the same pace, Q could form a short-term bottom between $0.055 and $0.07. But if deposit inflows pick up again, then $0.06 won’t be the bottom. Let’s see if this plays out. What do you think?