【Uniswap Does $13.079B in Weekly Volume, Half of the Total Across Five DEXs 🦄📊】
Join Mr. X’s fan group chat from the homepage 🔥
Over the past seven days, Uniswap processed $13.079 billion in on-chain trades. PancakeSwap, in second place, did just $5.892 billion. At $UNI in volume, Uniswap is half the size of its four rivals combined. Prices are falling, but on-chain trading hasn’t collapsed. That matters more than the rankings. 🦄
PancakeSwap did $5.892 billion in a week, driven by spot trading on BNB Chain. Aero ranked third with $3.538 billion, including $868 million in a single pool type, Slipstream. A quarter of its volume comes from one product line. That specialization shows who’s really making markets. 🍰
Pump ranked fourth with $1.938 billion, powered by Pump.fun’s market-making pools. BisonFi is close behind at $1.862 billion, a proprietary AMM on Solana. The two are just $76 million apart, so fifth place could change hands at any moment. This close competition is the norm as new chains fight for volume. 🌊
The five platforms totaled $26.309 billion, with Uniswap taking 49.7%. The other four combined did $13.231 billion—only just enough to match one platform. This kind of structure is rare. The leaderboard makes it clear: the winner takes almost all. 📈
In my view, the most valuable takeaway isn’t the ranking. It’s that volume hasn’t collapsed along with prices. $BTC is now at $80,624, down just 0.2% in 24 hours. Ethereum is at $2,350, down 1.2%, which looks rough. But the trades that need to change hands on-chain are still happening. 🧊
This leaderboard uses a rolling seven-day period. It’s not the same as last Friday’s Solana snapshot. Mix them up and it’s easy to draw the wrong conclusion. I only look at the seven-day figures. Don’t mistake a single day’s buzz for a trend. 🔍
📌 Uniswap did $13.079 billion in a week, or 49.7% of the $26.309 billion across the five platforms. Prices fell, but volume didn’t.
Have you been routing more of your trades through DEXs or exchanges lately?
Join Mr. X’s fan group chat from the homepage 🔥
Over the past seven days, Uniswap processed $13.079 billion in on-chain trades. PancakeSwap, in second place, did just $5.892 billion. At $UNI in volume, Uniswap is half the size of its four rivals combined. Prices are falling, but on-chain trading hasn’t collapsed. That matters more than the rankings. 🦄
PancakeSwap did $5.892 billion in a week, driven by spot trading on BNB Chain. Aero ranked third with $3.538 billion, including $868 million in a single pool type, Slipstream. A quarter of its volume comes from one product line. That specialization shows who’s really making markets. 🍰
Pump ranked fourth with $1.938 billion, powered by Pump.fun’s market-making pools. BisonFi is close behind at $1.862 billion, a proprietary AMM on Solana. The two are just $76 million apart, so fifth place could change hands at any moment. This close competition is the norm as new chains fight for volume. 🌊
The five platforms totaled $26.309 billion, with Uniswap taking 49.7%. The other four combined did $13.231 billion—only just enough to match one platform. This kind of structure is rare. The leaderboard makes it clear: the winner takes almost all. 📈
In my view, the most valuable takeaway isn’t the ranking. It’s that volume hasn’t collapsed along with prices. $BTC is now at $80,624, down just 0.2% in 24 hours. Ethereum is at $2,350, down 1.2%, which looks rough. But the trades that need to change hands on-chain are still happening. 🧊
This leaderboard uses a rolling seven-day period. It’s not the same as last Friday’s Solana snapshot. Mix them up and it’s easy to draw the wrong conclusion. I only look at the seven-day figures. Don’t mistake a single day’s buzz for a trend. 🔍
📌 Uniswap did $13.079 billion in a week, or 49.7% of the $26.309 billion across the five platforms. Prices fell, but volume didn’t.
Have you been routing more of your trades through DEXs or exchanges lately?
