I’ll be honest: when I first started looking at the agent economy, I thought it was mostly another AI narrative. The more I looked into it, the more I realized that the real opportunity may not be the agents themselves, but the infrastructure that allows them to actually operate.

That’s why Kite stands out to me.

My personal view is that AI agents will eventually become much more than chatbots or simple assistants. If they are going to work independently, they need to discover opportunities, interact with different services, coordinate with other agents, and execute tasks on behalf of users. Without proper infrastructure, even the smartest agent is still dependent on humans for almost every important step.

What I find interesting about Kite is its focus on building around this agent-centric economy rather than treating agents as just another AI feature.

I can see a future where I don’t have to manually visit five different platforms to complete one task. Instead, an agent could understand what I want, find the right options, communicate with other agents or services, and carry out the process according to rules I set.

That possibility is what makes me pay attention to Kite.

I’m not saying every AI-agent project will succeed, and I definitely don’t think a good narrative automatically means a good project. The difficult part will be building something reliable enough for real users and real economic activity. Trust, security, coordination, incentives, and user control will all matter.

But personally, I believe the shift from “AI that answers” to “AI that acts” could be one of the most important developments in the next stage of the internet.

And if the agent economy really takes off, I think projects building the infrastructure underneath it could become just as important as the agents themselves.

That’s the part of Kite I’m watching most closely.

#KiteBBW $KITE