It surged to $122 at the end of September, then closed at $103 yesterday. $SOL has made a full round trip over these 30 days. The 30-day gain stands at +1.81%, which is practically flat; the 7-day figure is still -6.55%, and 24-hour trading volume has shrunk to $1.70B. Compared with the $6.83B volume spike on September 22, the market now has little proactive buying interest. It looks more like a stalemate after the bears have also run out of steam.

Those who missed the move are in the toughest spot right now: if you didn’t get in during the run from $101 to $122, watching the price pull back leaves you paying a price either way. Chasing means betting that fresh capital will flow in again after this low-volume consolidation at $103; sitting it out means betting that the pullback isn’t over and there’s a bigger discount below $101.

My judgment hinges not on the day-to-day price action, but on the interplay between two conditions. If the price breaks below the recent 24-hour low of $101.41 and fails to reclaim it, then the supposed $101–103 “support” is only support on paper, and stop-loss orders will do the repricing for us. If, after volume contracts sharply, trading volume climbs back above $4B, that would more likely signal that selling pressure is exhausted than that the trend is continuing. After all, with 64.83% still separating us from the ATH and the one-year figure at -43.93%, the fundamentals aren’t strong enough to support fantasies of a V-shaped reversal.

Your call: at $103, would you take a small position now and bet on a low-volume bottom, wait for a break below $101 before acting, or chase confirmation after a high-volume breakout above $110? Each choice comes with a different cost. My question is: what does the signal candle you trust look like?