On October 15, South Korean memory stocks were hammered, while Micron closed up nearly 2% in U.S. trading.

The market is talking about MU now because two conflicting signals emerged on the same day: in the short term, it looks like a rebound after a panic sell-off, while over the longer term, some worry that memory supply could become excessive.

According to public discussion, trading in South Korea triggered a circuit breaker, and SK Hynix fell more than 11%; the exact decline still needs to be verified. U.S. tech stocks then recovered from selling at the open, with Micron closing up nearly 2% and Nvidia falling nearly 2%. This looks more like divergence within the sector than a broad-based recovery across the AI hardware supply chain.

Meanwhile, claims that “China will begin producing memory at scale in 2028, potentially leading to a glut in 2029” are also circulating. But these are projections about future capacity, not evidence that a glut has already materialized.

If supply fails to come onstream as expected, concerns about a glut may prove misplaced. But can a single day of gains for Micron really disprove the possibility that the memory industry is being repriced?