Starknet vote explores an independent L1
- A 7-day non-binding vote lets STRK holders decide whether to explore breaking away from Ethereum L2 and building a quantum-resistant L1. It confirms there will be no token issuance, and the bridge to Ethereum will remain open.
- Existing STARK hash proofs combined with native account abstraction mean user accounts can switch to quantum-resistant signatures without a protocol upgrade. The sticking points are that cross-chain bridges and data availability are still tied to Ethereum’s timeline.
The vote is non-binding, so STRK will likely get a short-term boost from the narrative during the 7-day window. But the transition would require restructuring data availability and bridges, which could take years to implement. Overhead supply has yet to be absorbed, so chasing the rally offers poor risk-reward.
Are you backing an independent L1 or sticking with L2 this time? What’s your cost basis for STRK?
$STRK $ETH $BTC
- A 7-day non-binding vote lets STRK holders decide whether to explore breaking away from Ethereum L2 and building a quantum-resistant L1. It confirms there will be no token issuance, and the bridge to Ethereum will remain open.
- Existing STARK hash proofs combined with native account abstraction mean user accounts can switch to quantum-resistant signatures without a protocol upgrade. The sticking points are that cross-chain bridges and data availability are still tied to Ethereum’s timeline.
The vote is non-binding, so STRK will likely get a short-term boost from the narrative during the 7-day window. But the transition would require restructuring data availability and bridges, which could take years to implement. Overhead supply has yet to be absorbed, so chasing the rally offers poor risk-reward.
Are you backing an independent L1 or sticking with L2 this time? What’s your cost basis for STRK?
$STRK $ETH $BTC