Supply changes after the launch too ๐ฅ
Following $INJ and $AVAX taught me to keep watching token structure long after the launch headlines disappear.
The original supply model is only the starting point.
What a protocol does with fees, supply, and staking over time matters more to me than how the token looked on day one, and burning + staking also tell different parts of that story.
One removes tokens permanently while the other shows how much supply holders are willing to commit for a defined period.
Aevo for example currently has both moving together.
AGP-3 and the monthly buyback program have now removed 78m AEVO, equal to 7.8% of the original supply, and at the same time, more than 27m AEVO is staked.
That is what I want to see from an established DeFi project still rebuilding its token model ๐ฎ
#Altcoin Season#
Following $INJ and $AVAX taught me to keep watching token structure long after the launch headlines disappear.
The original supply model is only the starting point.
What a protocol does with fees, supply, and staking over time matters more to me than how the token looked on day one, and burning + staking also tell different parts of that story.
One removes tokens permanently while the other shows how much supply holders are willing to commit for a defined period.
Aevo for example currently has both moving together.
AGP-3 and the monthly buyback program have now removed 78m AEVO, equal to 7.8% of the original supply, and at the same time, more than 27m AEVO is staked.
That is what I want to see from an established DeFi project still rebuilding its token model ๐ฎ
#Altcoin Season#