$AEVO A 99% collapse, yet the coin is still listed on Binance
AEVO was listed in March 2024 and reached a peak of around 3.94. Today, it trades near 0.024, meaning anyone who bought at the peak has lost more than 99% of their money.
Questions worth discussing:
How does Binance review its listing standards, and is it enough for trading volume to remain “acceptable” for a collapsed coin to stay listed?
Why does the new-listing pattern keep repeating: a small circulating supply, a rapid surge, then a prolonged decline borne by retail investors?
Are warning labels enough, or should there be greater transparency about token unlock schedules before listing?
To be fair, the project is still operating, there is a token-burning program, and Binance has not announced any delisting. But the project’s survival does not make up for the losses suffered by those who bought at the peak.
The takeaway: being listed on a major exchange is no guarantee of quality. Check the token schedule and liquidity yourself, and invest only what you can afford to lose.
AEVO was listed in March 2024 and reached a peak of around 3.94. Today, it trades near 0.024, meaning anyone who bought at the peak has lost more than 99% of their money.
Questions worth discussing:
How does Binance review its listing standards, and is it enough for trading volume to remain “acceptable” for a collapsed coin to stay listed?
Why does the new-listing pattern keep repeating: a small circulating supply, a rapid surge, then a prolonged decline borne by retail investors?
Are warning labels enough, or should there be greater transparency about token unlock schedules before listing?
To be fair, the project is still operating, there is a token-burning program, and Binance has not announced any delisting. But the project’s survival does not make up for the losses suffered by those who bought at the peak.
The takeaway: being listed on a major exchange is no guarantee of quality. Check the token schedule and liquidity yourself, and invest only what you can afford to lose.