【Four wallets frozen just like that, then released two hours later 🔒🔓】
Join Mr. X’s fan chat from the homepage 🔥
A treasury on-chain was suddenly frozen. It came out of nowhere. The issuer of $USDT didn’t give anyone a heads-up. The coins in all four wallets were locked tight, unable to move. A total of 1.45 million USDT was stuck for half a day. Someone’s just given us another lesson in what “decentralization” really means. 🧊
It happened quickly on Friday morning this week. A THORChain co-founder was the first to speak out, posting that the issuer had directly blacklisted his wallet address. There was no communication beforehand, and he was just as confused as everyone else. Two hours later, all the funds were unfrozen and transactions returned to normal. 🔄
Four wallet addresses were frozen this time. And there are plenty of similar cases. This week, Conduit took the issuer to court, alleging that 2.76 million USDT had been frozen without cause. The amount isn’t huge, but the implications are hard to ignore. 🧾
This definitely isn’t the first time it’s happened. In August this year, two Thai people sued the issuer, saying that 42.4 million USDT had been frozen. The alleged reason was nothing more than a verbal request. On-chain assets can just disappear like that—who’s ultimately responsible? 📜
Personally, I don’t think this is complicated at all. The issuer holds one enormous master switch. No matter how free the blockchain is, it still has to answer to them. I admit that $USDT is very convenient. But convenience and risk have always gone hand in hand. 🔐
Meanwhile, the Senate is continuing to ask questions—this time about the issuer’s ties to politicians. Freezes, lawsuits, hearings: one thing after another. There’s really not much retail investors can do. Spread your holdings around, and put protecting your principal first. 🧭
📌 On-chain doesn’t mean unregulated. Whether your funds get frozen depends on who holds the switch.
Do you think the issuer should have the power to freeze funds with one click? Let’s talk in the comments.
Join Mr. X’s fan chat from the homepage 🔥
A treasury on-chain was suddenly frozen. It came out of nowhere. The issuer of $USDT didn’t give anyone a heads-up. The coins in all four wallets were locked tight, unable to move. A total of 1.45 million USDT was stuck for half a day. Someone’s just given us another lesson in what “decentralization” really means. 🧊
It happened quickly on Friday morning this week. A THORChain co-founder was the first to speak out, posting that the issuer had directly blacklisted his wallet address. There was no communication beforehand, and he was just as confused as everyone else. Two hours later, all the funds were unfrozen and transactions returned to normal. 🔄
Four wallet addresses were frozen this time. And there are plenty of similar cases. This week, Conduit took the issuer to court, alleging that 2.76 million USDT had been frozen without cause. The amount isn’t huge, but the implications are hard to ignore. 🧾
This definitely isn’t the first time it’s happened. In August this year, two Thai people sued the issuer, saying that 42.4 million USDT had been frozen. The alleged reason was nothing more than a verbal request. On-chain assets can just disappear like that—who’s ultimately responsible? 📜
Personally, I don’t think this is complicated at all. The issuer holds one enormous master switch. No matter how free the blockchain is, it still has to answer to them. I admit that $USDT is very convenient. But convenience and risk have always gone hand in hand. 🔐
Meanwhile, the Senate is continuing to ask questions—this time about the issuer’s ties to politicians. Freezes, lawsuits, hearings: one thing after another. There’s really not much retail investors can do. Spread your holdings around, and put protecting your principal first. 🧭
📌 On-chain doesn’t mean unregulated. Whether your funds get frozen depends on who holds the switch.
Do you think the issuer should have the power to freeze funds with one click? Let’s talk in the comments.