#nearintents用户付费超2900万美元
👉 跨链意图怎么看，币安聊天室跟进
The numbers for Near Intents are in.
Users have paid over $29 million in total.
This is a chain built for intent-based trading.
What is an intent?
You just say what you want to swap, not how to do it.
Routing, splitting orders, and cross-chain swaps are left to solvers.
Users have to click fewer times, making the experience smoother.
The downside is another layer of intermediaries, with the spread hidden from view.
The flip side of convenience is giving up control.
What does $29 million tell us?
It proves people are willing to pay for convenience.
Cross-chain transactions are inherently fragmented.
Users' pain points are real, and so is their willingness to pay.
In the past, cross-chain activity relied on bridges, which were plagued by incidents.
Intents shift the risk onto solvers.
The risk hasn't disappeared; it's just moved somewhere else.
The risks are clear, too.
Solvers are highly concentrated and could become the new middlemen.
Opaque matching can eat into your trades through slippage.
When liquidity is thin, quotes can be even worse.
In crypto, intent-based trading is competing with wallets and aggregators.
Do you think intent-based trading will replace the way we swap today? Let's talk in the comments.
👉 跨链意图怎么看，币安聊天室跟进
The numbers for Near Intents are in.
Users have paid over $29 million in total.
This is a chain built for intent-based trading.
What is an intent?
You just say what you want to swap, not how to do it.
Routing, splitting orders, and cross-chain swaps are left to solvers.
Users have to click fewer times, making the experience smoother.
The downside is another layer of intermediaries, with the spread hidden from view.
The flip side of convenience is giving up control.
What does $29 million tell us?
It proves people are willing to pay for convenience.
Cross-chain transactions are inherently fragmented.
Users' pain points are real, and so is their willingness to pay.
In the past, cross-chain activity relied on bridges, which were plagued by incidents.
Intents shift the risk onto solvers.
The risk hasn't disappeared; it's just moved somewhere else.
The risks are clear, too.
Solvers are highly concentrated and could become the new middlemen.
Opaque matching can eat into your trades through slippage.
When liquidity is thin, quotes can be even worse.
In crypto, intent-based trading is competing with wallets and aggregators.
Do you think intent-based trading will replace the way we swap today? Let's talk in the comments.