On October 8, three trading competitions—CT, COAI, and pPOLY—wrapped up in a concentrated finish, yet DGAI was mentioned repeatedly.
What the market is discussing now is this: after other events end, will limit order trading shift toward DGAI. This is an expectation of traffic migration, not evidence that demand for DGAI has actually strengthened.
The end times listed in public discussion are: CT and COAI at 21:00, and pPOLY at 22:00. Meanwhile, yesterday’s total limit order trading volume was about 1.464 billion, down 2.68% from the previous day—overall, there was no volume expansion. For DGAI, the remaining time has also been described in two different ways—“8 days” and “7 days” on the same day. Treating either as a precise countdown may also misread the rhythm.
At present, there is a lack of cross-evidence that DGAI’s own trading volume continues to grow. If post-event discussion still revolves only around operational moves, could the so-called “handoff” simply be misreading a short-term task as genuine demand?
What the market is discussing now is this: after other events end, will limit order trading shift toward DGAI. This is an expectation of traffic migration, not evidence that demand for DGAI has actually strengthened.
The end times listed in public discussion are: CT and COAI at 21:00, and pPOLY at 22:00. Meanwhile, yesterday’s total limit order trading volume was about 1.464 billion, down 2.68% from the previous day—overall, there was no volume expansion. For DGAI, the remaining time has also been described in two different ways—“8 days” and “7 days” on the same day. Treating either as a precise countdown may also misread the rhythm.
At present, there is a lack of cross-evidence that DGAI’s own trading volume continues to grow. If post-event discussion still revolves only around operational moves, could the so-called “handoff” simply be misreading a short-term task as genuine demand?