šØ TRUMP WANTS TO CALL AI āSUPER INTELLIGENCEā
The AI race is getting heatedāeven over what to call it.
Trump has publicly used āSuper Intelligenceā instead of āArtificial Intelligence.ā As for the report claiming the White House will treat anyone still using āAIā as an āenemy,ā I havenāt verified the original statement, so I wonāt treat it as confirmed.
In my view, a new name can attract attention. But whether the technology is actually better still comes down to the product, practical applications, and real value.
The same goes for crypto. Putting āAIā or āsuper intelligenceā in a projectās name isnāt enough to make its token worth investing in.
What I want to see is: Does it have real users? What problem does the product solve? And how does that activity create value for the token?
Breaking news can draw attention quickly. But turning that attention into sustained capital inflows is another matter.
Do you think āSuper Intelligenceā will become the marketās next narrative, or is it simply a new name?
The AI race is getting heatedāeven over what to call it.
Trump has publicly used āSuper Intelligenceā instead of āArtificial Intelligence.ā As for the report claiming the White House will treat anyone still using āAIā as an āenemy,ā I havenāt verified the original statement, so I wonāt treat it as confirmed.
In my view, a new name can attract attention. But whether the technology is actually better still comes down to the product, practical applications, and real value.
The same goes for crypto. Putting āAIā or āsuper intelligenceā in a projectās name isnāt enough to make its token worth investing in.
What I want to see is: Does it have real users? What problem does the product solve? And how does that activity create value for the token?
Breaking news can draw attention quickly. But turning that attention into sustained capital inflows is another matter.
Do you think āSuper Intelligenceā will become the marketās next narrative, or is it simply a new name?