Tonight, just looking at this leaderboard, the heat looks like it’s ebbing. The top gainer surged up more than forty-odd points, but with shrinking volume it’s now giving some of that back; the top loser is grinding slowly along the floor, and it hasn’t even managed to print a decent-looking panic volume. In one sentence: the money that chased higher is taking a break, and the people who want to cut losses aren’t in a hurry—sentiment is pretty watch-and-wait.

First, let’s talk about $MET . Up 43% over 24 hours, with turnover of over 700M. This is real volume and real money pushing it up—not just a push without support. But look at the details: in the past 4 hours it’s down more than 8 points, and in the past 1 hour the trading volume is only 0.6 times the daily average. That’s a textbook pattern: after a spike, volume shrinks and it pulls back. The batch of funds that chased in isn’t really working in the short term. The good news is price is still sitting around 63% of the 24-hour range level—so it hasn’t fully given everything back.

Next is $MINA . Down 14.6%, with price resting around 15% of the range—basically right near the lows. Volume is only 0.94 times the average, with no sign of expansion. This isn’t a panic-driven selloff; it’s a slow bleed with no one stepping in. Sellers are too lazy to smash the price down, and buyers are even more hesitant to touch it—so it just grinds lower little by little.

Given this structure, my stance is very clear: don’t chase. The one that’s been pumped is now shrinking on its pullback; the one that’s sliding doesn’t show any sign of a bottom. Both sides don’t offer a good deal. I’d rather wait for two signals: either in the pullback of the one that’s been rising, volume returns and price holds steady; or in the one that’s been falling, one day it truly prints a wave of volume, showing that there are funds willing to take it. Until then, let’s watch more and move less—let the bullets fly for a bit.

#行情分析 #涨幅榜 #跌幅榜

The above is a fish-raising note and does not constitute investment advice. How deep the pond is—go and test it yourself.