๐Ÿ“ฐ Maple Financeโ€™s story didnโ€™t begin with a plan to build an โ€œon-chain bank.โ€ It began with two traditional finance professionals trying to bring bonds and loans on-chain.
Founder Sid Powell worked as a credit risk analyst at National Australia Bank, where he helped issue more than $3 billion in corporate bonds. Co-founder Joe Flanagan, meanwhile, had worked in consulting and as a CFO, and led more than $400 million in debt and equity financing.
๐Ÿ”ฅ Their backgrounds complemented each other perfectly: Sid knew banks and capital providers, while Joe had firsthand experience of a large company collapsing because of balance sheet and liquidity problems. To be frank, that experience directly influenced Mapleโ€™s product direction.

Maple initially wanted to package bonds and loans from traditional institutions and bring them on-chain, but soon discovered that no institutions were willing to hand over their assets. In early 2020, they shifted to on-chain credit lendingโ€”not lending to individuals, but directing funds to institutional borrowers who were easier to assess.
๐Ÿ’ก The model soon became clear: investors deposit USDC into a pool, credit managers assess institutional borrowers, and once the funds are lent out, the institutions pay interest that is then distributed to investors. In March 2021, Maple raised $1.4 million in seed funding, and in May it officially launched its first pool.

โš ๏ธ But the 2022 bear market exposed the weaknesses of this model. Unsecured credit loans have no collateral, so if a borrower canโ€™t repay, itโ€™s difficult for investors to recover their losses by auctioning off assets. And to remain asset-light and isolate risk, Maple mainly provides a lending platform rather than participating directly in lending. What do you think is the hardest problem to solve in on-chain private credit: screening borrowers or determining responsibility after a default?
#MapleFinance #RWA #้“พไธŠไฟก่ดท #DeFi