【Retail Traders’ Self-Defense Manifesto · Part Six · A Record of the Resurrection】

Prologue: The exact moment the trade-call machine came back to life. On October 4, not a single post all day on the forum; October 5, “Stop asking about me all the time”; October 6, “Thanks for sticking around. Let’s keep waiting for a big move.” Then, on October 7, two posts in one day—back at full strength. In the morning, he rehearsed questions for a livestream and made the fans holding long positions put on a tearful “boo-hoo-hoo” act. In the afternoon, he went straight to mocking them: “If you missed the move, that’s your problem. Even if it happens ten more times, you still won’t dare follow.” The catalyst wasn’t his mood; it was the candlesticks: over two trading days, BTC fell from above 86,700 to 83,442 (verified against both Binance and OKX), a pullback of about 3.7%. Part Five had just said that the volume knob would turn itself back up the moment the price fell again. It turned back up faster than expected: there was no need to fall all the way to 79,400. A correction of less than 4% was enough to crank the microphone to full volume.

I. The nine-day voice chart: an amplifier linked to price. Here are his public posts since October 1, laid out chronologically (all archived original posts from Binance Square): 10/1: “It’s not that I can short—it’s that I’m guaranteed to short! Your undefeated guaranteed-short guy here,” BTC around 83,600; 10/2: “I’m in a short, waiting for the result” + posted profit ranking: $1,979, around 84,000; 10/3: “For a while, I’ll only trade in one direction and wait for the market’s answer,” around 84,000+; 10/4: no posts all day, 83,800 to 84,100; 10/5: “Stop asking about me all the time,” around 85,000, then that evening he resumed posting daily: “The bearish divergence is still in play”; 10/6: “Are you judging by the past? Just a coincidence? I’ll keep waiting for a big move!” as price continued up from 85,500 to 86,700; 10/7: “Your guaranteed-short guy is bearish now~ If you didn’t catch it, that’s your problem,” as BTC turned down at 83,442. Read vertically, this is a posting history; read horizontally, it’s an amplifier: every time price climbed a step, the volume dropped a notch; the moment price turned, it went straight to full volume. The voice-pattern law from article five got a complete test in both directions this week.

II. He finally read out the disclaimer. Here are his exact words from the afternoon of October 7—worth framing in their entirety: “Plan your own trades, trade your own plan. If you find the ideas I share useful, go ahead and use them~ Whether you make money or how much you make has nothing to do with me.” This is the most important sentence in all six articles in this series—because it’s the most honest description of the signal-selling business: he supplies the ideas; you bear the profit or loss. He calls the direction; you take the risk. As for the income, he has already posted those three figures himself: 120,000 U in tips, $4,124 from a single livestream, and $1,979 in live-trading profits. Every dollar came from your trading fees and gifts. That same morning, he was rehearsing questions for a livestream, acting out an anxious fan holding a long position: “What should I do with my long now, wuwuwu”—while on September 18, the title of his Square post was “Big profits on my long position.” In his content, bulls are traffic to be comforted; in his livestreams, bears are material to be mocked. He’s on stage whichever way the market goes.

III. The ledger, day 19. First-generation short: 79,400 on September 18. Today BTC’s low was 83,442, still about 4.8% above the entry price—after a drop of more than 3,000 points in three days, it’s still a long way from breakeven. Second generation: the roughly 84,000 short he said he entered on October 2. When price surged to 87,000 on October 5, its unrealized loss briefly reached 3.5%; today it came close to breakeven for the first time. He says he’s only been short this week, and if he really did open a new short above 86,000, then today it would indeed be in profit—we’ll record that honestly: this is the first time in three weeks he’s been on the same side as the market. But, as always, there’s a catch: the statement for that 79,400 trade has still not been mentioned once in any of the six posts since October 5. Over three weeks, he’s posted tips, livestream cards, profit rankings, and screenshots of his short positions. The only four numbers still missing are the entry price, leverage, stop-loss price, and exit price. A profitable short needs no words; posting proof takes just one screenshot—yet the more screenshots he posts, the clearer it becomes that the 79,400 trade isn’t among them.

IV. If you didn’t catch it, whose problem is that, really? “Even if you get ten more chances, you still won’t dare follow”—he was half right. Anyone who followed the 79,400 short on September 18 is now down about 6%, proving why not daring to follow was reasonable. Followers have never lacked courage; they’ve lacked information. He has a trade statement he won’t show; you have a liquidation price you haven’t calculated. What lies between you isn’t a gap in understanding—it’s the half he left out.

Conclusion: He’s back—good. The ledger is back too. Let this article stand as a record: if this short really falls below 79,400, we’ll be the first to record that he made good on it; if it rebounds to 86,000, we’ll record that too. He posts screenshots; we settle the books. He mocks; we archive. “It has nothing to do with me”—frame that line and make it the epigraph for this whole series.

Sources: All six posts on Yanchi Bit’s Binance Square profile from 10/5 to 10/7 (checked one by one against live posts on the evening of 10/7, including two posts each on 10/7, 10/6, and 10/5, plus the comments); market data cross-checked via Binance and OKX APIs (around 83,900 when this was published on 10/7; 24-hour high of 86,699 and low of 83,442); historical posts from 9/16 to 10/5 archived individually as part of this series. This article comments on public information and is not investment advice.