$AIN 0,0488 — 5am wick up to 0,0579 then dropped to 0,0356; both moves occurred within the same 1H candle.
The 4H frame is still a straight vertical pump column; 1H and 15m from there form a gradually lower peak.
Over more than two weeks it moved sideways between 0,020–0,026. Last night at 9pm, a 1H candle surged from 0,0232 to 0,0442. In 24h it increased 105%; open interest rose from 5.9 to 18.5 million USD. Positive funding of 0,21–0,33% per 4-hour period: the longs are paying very expensive costs to keep the position open.
After the sweep, the 1H high couldn’t break above 0,052. In mid-September this ticker once went up to 0,217, then on September 16 fell to 0,019.
Adjustments lean toward 0,038–0,040, around the low formed between 7h–8h this morning. Wrong if 1H closes above 0,0536.
0,0579 — is the high from this pumping round, or just a sweep?
Personal observation, not financial advice. Risk is 1%; there’s always a point where you stop.
#AIN $AIN
The 4H frame is still a straight vertical pump column; 1H and 15m from there form a gradually lower peak.
Over more than two weeks it moved sideways between 0,020–0,026. Last night at 9pm, a 1H candle surged from 0,0232 to 0,0442. In 24h it increased 105%; open interest rose from 5.9 to 18.5 million USD. Positive funding of 0,21–0,33% per 4-hour period: the longs are paying very expensive costs to keep the position open.
After the sweep, the 1H high couldn’t break above 0,052. In mid-September this ticker once went up to 0,217, then on September 16 fell to 0,019.
Adjustments lean toward 0,038–0,040, around the low formed between 7h–8h this morning. Wrong if 1H closes above 0,0536.
0,0579 — is the high from this pumping round, or just a sweep?
Personal observation, not financial advice. Risk is 1%; there’s always a point where you stop.
#AIN $AIN
