$STRK The most abnormal thing is that in 30 days the price doubled, yet even with the ATH it’s still down by -98.75%. It only managed to get rid of the “s-shape” after doubling—this distance alone shows it hadn’t actually died off completely.
Looking at the data, you can see the truly关键 turning point happened on September 19. The night before, its 24h trading volume was still under $20 million. The next day, that candle immediately printed a volume of 237M—nearly the sum of the volume from the previous half-month. If the first few days were just a technical rebound, then the volume on September 19 can only be understood as a clearly visible accumulation/position-building event.
I want the reader to judge this situation— which explanation fits your observation better? One is that there’s capital that actively stepped in after hitting the bottom range, a “left-side entry.” The other is that the short-term squeeze was driven by liquidity drying up, which attracted the chasing crowd. The signals I need to confirm correspond to the two directions: if the price pulls back but does not break the $0.042 range, and the成交量 can still remain above tens of millions, that would confirm they are more likely “left-side” (accumulation). If, after the volume shrinks, it falls back below $0.04, then it may mean the short positions—i.e., the “short” positions—have been fully squeezed out, and it’s being supported only by the remaining supply of shares.
Putting aside price predictions, just based on the price spread achieved by this成交量—from $0.026 to $0.055—this move may already have included a completed position.
Looking at the data, you can see the truly关键 turning point happened on September 19. The night before, its 24h trading volume was still under $20 million. The next day, that candle immediately printed a volume of 237M—nearly the sum of the volume from the previous half-month. If the first few days were just a technical rebound, then the volume on September 19 can only be understood as a clearly visible accumulation/position-building event.
I want the reader to judge this situation— which explanation fits your observation better? One is that there’s capital that actively stepped in after hitting the bottom range, a “left-side entry.” The other is that the short-term squeeze was driven by liquidity drying up, which attracted the chasing crowd. The signals I need to confirm correspond to the two directions: if the price pulls back but does not break the $0.042 range, and the成交量 can still remain above tens of millions, that would confirm they are more likely “left-side” (accumulation). If, after the volume shrinks, it falls back below $0.04, then it may mean the short positions—i.e., the “short” positions—have been fully squeezed out, and it’s being supported only by the remaining supply of shares.
Putting aside price predictions, just based on the price spread achieved by this成交量—from $0.026 to $0.055—this move may already have included a completed position.