Down 0.4%, but the position is up 20.5%
It fell.
0.16167 USDT, 24h -0.4%.
So why do people keep adding positions?
Position size +20.5%. 4.7M → 5.2M → 5.4M → 5.7M. Four rounds—added all the way.
Trading volume: $15.8M. Market cap: $196.4M. Spot trading pairs are active.
Funding rate: +0.0009% to -0.0007%. It turned negative.
Shorts are in control. At the same time, the holding cost for short positions is starting to rise.
Look again: price down, OI up 20.5%. Real money and real settlement—this isn’t a low-volume, drifting selloff.
Low prices + negative funding rate = a potential short squeeze (covering). Just a possibility, not a guarantee.
Conclusion: direction is unclear, but costs move first.
Before entering, calculate your own leverage first—then look at other people’s positions.
Risk warning: negative funding rate isn’t a talisman; liquidation is always about leverage.
#MINA #币安 #Bitcoin
It fell.
0.16167 USDT, 24h -0.4%.
So why do people keep adding positions?
Position size +20.5%. 4.7M → 5.2M → 5.4M → 5.7M. Four rounds—added all the way.
Trading volume: $15.8M. Market cap: $196.4M. Spot trading pairs are active.
Funding rate: +0.0009% to -0.0007%. It turned negative.
Shorts are in control. At the same time, the holding cost for short positions is starting to rise.
Look again: price down, OI up 20.5%. Real money and real settlement—this isn’t a low-volume, drifting selloff.
Low prices + negative funding rate = a potential short squeeze (covering). Just a possibility, not a guarantee.
Conclusion: direction is unclear, but costs move first.
Before entering, calculate your own leverage first—then look at other people’s positions.
Risk warning: negative funding rate isn’t a talisman; liquidation is always about leverage.
#MINA #币安 #Bitcoin