I have a question that has puzzled me since I entered the trading field.
If we follow this logic: suppose someone enters a buy trade, and in the same entry zone, his friend enters a sell trade. After some time, one of them must be the winner and the other the loser, if the price moves in a clear direction.
So logically, there is always a winning trade, but the problem is that we don’t know in advance whether the correct trade is the buy or the sell.
This is my question: if there is always one side that can profit and another side that can lose, why is it said that the percentage of losing trades is far greater than the percentage of winning trades?
Where is the flaw in this logic?
#BitcoinFundingRateTriplesTo10%
If we follow this logic: suppose someone enters a buy trade, and in the same entry zone, his friend enters a sell trade. After some time, one of them must be the winner and the other the loser, if the price moves in a clear direction.
So logically, there is always a winning trade, but the problem is that we don’t know in advance whether the correct trade is the buy or the sell.
This is my question: if there is always one side that can profit and another side that can lose, why is it said that the percentage of losing trades is far greater than the percentage of winning trades?
Where is the flaw in this logic?
#BitcoinFundingRateTriplesTo10%