You Missed $LAB ? It Did Over 100x... And Now $BTW Is Showing A Pattern That Looks Very Familiar 😱
Guys, I put my LAB and BTW charts side by side, then went deeper into the BTW on-chain data.
The chart structure immediately caught my attention. LAB spent roughly 22 days consolidating before its explosive expansion. BTW spent around 25 days building its base, then broke out and started moving much more controlled, with pullbacks and higher lows instead of one straight vertical move.
But the bigger clue is the supply structure.
Bitquery's investigation published 2 days ago traced BTW from its original 10B-token creation wallet. The main wallet sent 120M BTW to Bitget and 10M to HTX. Another 200M BTW was routed through a middle wallet and split across 44 newly created wallets. Those wallets later moved a combined 196M BTW into the two exchange deposit addresses. They says the chain data alone cannot prove whether those tokens were sold, held or used by market makers. That's interesting because LAB had a similar concentrated-supply structure, but LAB later had much stronger reported evidence of actual distribution: an entity linked by investigators to the LAB team reportedly received 196M+ LAB, with 18.4M LAB subsequently sold around July 10-12 as price fell sharply.
Now look at BTW today. 101.62M BTW unlocked on October 2, worth roughly $137.7M, equal to about 1.02% of total supply and 3.75% of market cap. At the same time, BTW has been holding near its new ATH around $1.4.
LAB was extremely fast and violent. BTW is much more controlled. So honestly, I wouldn't be shocked if $10 eventually becomes a level BTW tests.
But I don't expect a straight move from $1.45 to $10. If this structure keeps developing, I'd expect multiple pullbacks, liquidity sweeps and higher lows along the way. LAB showed us how explosive this type of structure can become. BTW is showing a more controlled version of it. That's why I'm watching this one very closely.
If you want these setups before everyone starts talking about them, stay with @MeowAlert . $XRP
Guys, I put my LAB and BTW charts side by side, then went deeper into the BTW on-chain data.
The chart structure immediately caught my attention. LAB spent roughly 22 days consolidating before its explosive expansion. BTW spent around 25 days building its base, then broke out and started moving much more controlled, with pullbacks and higher lows instead of one straight vertical move.
But the bigger clue is the supply structure.
Bitquery's investigation published 2 days ago traced BTW from its original 10B-token creation wallet. The main wallet sent 120M BTW to Bitget and 10M to HTX. Another 200M BTW was routed through a middle wallet and split across 44 newly created wallets. Those wallets later moved a combined 196M BTW into the two exchange deposit addresses. They says the chain data alone cannot prove whether those tokens were sold, held or used by market makers. That's interesting because LAB had a similar concentrated-supply structure, but LAB later had much stronger reported evidence of actual distribution: an entity linked by investigators to the LAB team reportedly received 196M+ LAB, with 18.4M LAB subsequently sold around July 10-12 as price fell sharply.
Now look at BTW today. 101.62M BTW unlocked on October 2, worth roughly $137.7M, equal to about 1.02% of total supply and 3.75% of market cap. At the same time, BTW has been holding near its new ATH around $1.4.
LAB was extremely fast and violent. BTW is much more controlled. So honestly, I wouldn't be shocked if $10 eventually becomes a level BTW tests.
But I don't expect a straight move from $1.45 to $10. If this structure keeps developing, I'd expect multiple pullbacks, liquidity sweeps and higher lows along the way. LAB showed us how explosive this type of structure can become. BTW is showing a more controlled version of it. That's why I'm watching this one very closely.
If you want these setups before everyone starts talking about them, stay with @MeowAlert . $XRP
