Correct the data for the two posts made in the morning; the issue is the same: by the time they were posted, the data was already outdated.
1. The 10:00 ETF post: I wrote that, excluding IBIT, the total outflow on 10/1 was $92.9 million; at that time, IBIT hadn’t been updated yet.
Now Farside has been updated: IBIT had an inflow of $195.6 million on 10/1, and the total for that day was a net inflow of $102.7 million—not an outflow.
“Outflows on two consecutive days” is true only for 9/30.
2. The 9:40 chart showing the first 10 pullbacks before September: the data was taken in Beijing before noon, and in the chart the $MOVR figure is still 14% higher than the September peak.
But in Beijing, from 1 PM to the next hour, it dropped from 2.64 to 2.08; now it’s around 2.12, which is about 10% below the September peak of 2.345.
So, currently none of the “first 10 before September” entries are standing above the September peak.
The rules have changed: for data posts published later, retrieve the numbers again before posting.
$BTC
1. The 10:00 ETF post: I wrote that, excluding IBIT, the total outflow on 10/1 was $92.9 million; at that time, IBIT hadn’t been updated yet.
Now Farside has been updated: IBIT had an inflow of $195.6 million on 10/1, and the total for that day was a net inflow of $102.7 million—not an outflow.
“Outflows on two consecutive days” is true only for 9/30.
2. The 9:40 chart showing the first 10 pullbacks before September: the data was taken in Beijing before noon, and in the chart the $MOVR figure is still 14% higher than the September peak.
But in Beijing, from 1 PM to the next hour, it dropped from 2.64 to 2.08; now it’s around 2.12, which is about 10% below the September peak of 2.345.
So, currently none of the “first 10 before September” entries are standing above the September peak.
The rules have changed: for data posts published later, retrieve the numbers again before posting.
$BTC