#uraniumfinance案开庭
👉 链上追责这案子，币安聊天室跟进
The case of Uranium Finance went to trial.
The defendant is a cybersecurity consultant.
Prosecutors claim he tampered with things in 2021.
A total of 26 liquidity pools were used one by one.
The amount involved was USD 53.3 million.
The method isn’t complicated.
A loophole in the contract was miscalculated by a number.
The gap was then exploited.
The money went around on-chain.
Four years later, the man sat in the defendant’s dock.
On-chain records have not disappeared.
The addresses and transfers are matched one by one.
The on-chain tools can trace where the funds went.
The cross-chain bridge routes and the paths involving mixers are also being pursued.
The cooperation of exchanges is one part of it.
The defendant denied some of the charges.
The focus of the case is whether the loophole was intentionally used.
For crypto, transparency is a double-edged sword.
It makes defense harder and accountability easier.
In the end, code errors have to be borne by people.
Do you think on-chain forensics will make cases like this easier to adjudicate? Discuss in the comments
👉 链上追责这案子，币安聊天室跟进
The case of Uranium Finance went to trial.
The defendant is a cybersecurity consultant.
Prosecutors claim he tampered with things in 2021.
A total of 26 liquidity pools were used one by one.
The amount involved was USD 53.3 million.
The method isn’t complicated.
A loophole in the contract was miscalculated by a number.
The gap was then exploited.
The money went around on-chain.
Four years later, the man sat in the defendant’s dock.
On-chain records have not disappeared.
The addresses and transfers are matched one by one.
The on-chain tools can trace where the funds went.
The cross-chain bridge routes and the paths involving mixers are also being pursued.
The cooperation of exchanges is one part of it.
The defendant denied some of the charges.
The focus of the case is whether the loophole was intentionally used.
For crypto, transparency is a double-edged sword.
It makes defense harder and accountability easier.
In the end, code errors have to be borne by people.
Do you think on-chain forensics will make cases like this easier to adjudicate? Discuss in the comments
