#genius法案稳定币规则落地
👉 稳定币新规，币安聊天室跟进
The federal rules for stablecoins are now in place.
Issuers that issue licenses must have full reserves.
A 1:1 ratio is a hard requirement.
The types of reserve assets are also restricted.
This line of regulation covers payment-type stablecoins.
Their scale is tied to on-chain transactions and settlement.
With the rules clarified, banks and payment companies will dare to move in.
On the same day, there is an industry summit in Seoul.
The theme is institutional capital going on-chain.
Stablecoins are the most mature segment within it.
Cross-border payments are the first target.
They connect with banks and clearing networks.
Stablecoins are faster here than transfers.
Licenses to issue are divided into federal and state levels.
Reserve transparency directly determines trust.
Requirements for audits and custody are written into the provisions.
Smaller issuers have to be filtered out by costs.
For crypto, stablecoins are the cash layer on-chain.
The clearer the rules, the thicker the cash layer.
When it becomes thick enough, institutions are willing to stay long term.
Do you think the compliance costs of stablecoins will squeeze out smaller issuers? Let’s discuss in the comments.
👉 稳定币新规，币安聊天室跟进
The federal rules for stablecoins are now in place.
Issuers that issue licenses must have full reserves.
A 1:1 ratio is a hard requirement.
The types of reserve assets are also restricted.
This line of regulation covers payment-type stablecoins.
Their scale is tied to on-chain transactions and settlement.
With the rules clarified, banks and payment companies will dare to move in.
On the same day, there is an industry summit in Seoul.
The theme is institutional capital going on-chain.
Stablecoins are the most mature segment within it.
Cross-border payments are the first target.
They connect with banks and clearing networks.
Stablecoins are faster here than transfers.
Licenses to issue are divided into federal and state levels.
Reserve transparency directly determines trust.
Requirements for audits and custody are written into the provisions.
Smaller issuers have to be filtered out by costs.
For crypto, stablecoins are the cash layer on-chain.
The clearer the rules, the thicker the cash layer.
When it becomes thick enough, institutions are willing to stay long term.
Do you think the compliance costs of stablecoins will squeeze out smaller issuers? Let’s discuss in the comments.
