The comment section is all cursing me, saying that time contracts are gambling. But to put it another way: with small capital, besides playing events and high leverage, what else can you play? The risks are the same. If your 1000u principal starts from 250u and you lose, you lose 250u—then you have four chances. If you win, at least 80% of the time, right? In a trending move, wouldn’t the probability of winning consecutively be higher than when you bet on copycat contracts or go high leverage? The 250u re-investment method: 250u × 0.8 = 200; 400 × 0.8 = 320; 720 × 0.8 = 576; 1036 × 0.8 = 828.8. If you win four in a row, then 828 + 576 = 1404u. The probability of winning four in a row on the ten-minute timeframe is higher than the probability of you gambling in a rollover on a copycat contract. Event contracts are betting on direction—if you end up “going all in,” that’s your own problem. Like the contract itself: leverage is just a tool. Event contracts allow you to control your adding to positions—go all-in. Just my personal view. $ETH