I want to find promising coins like $LAB $RAVE $BEAT

And I’m somewhere on the right path; on the one hand, they’re in no way connected

On the other hand, they all follow the same pattern; I’m not even talking about growth right now

Coins like that are the kind people really want to make money off of us

And they do everything to get onto Binance; for example, contests, and there are a couple more details, including things related to unlocks on the listing.

And this connection can be traced not only with the three coins mentioned above, but also with ones like SOON AIA MYX COAI TRADOOR BANK CAP UB, and almost everything that got pumped. There’s much less of a connection visible with AKE RIVER, but it’s there. As for SIREN PIPPIN and TRB, they were cooking up their own thing.

I still haven’t reviewed all the coins—I need to track the ones where the pumping scenario didn’t work. For example, RLS that fit this scheme perfectly, but it got delisted. And now there’s even a note about low liquidity. Need to understand why that happened.

For now I won’t advise you anything. Once I go through all the coins, I’ll tell you what you should pay attention to.

Because there’s also another bunch of coins that moved the same way—the criteria fit—but from the Alpha sector they didn’t go to futures or spot. The question is why?

Are there coins that only started trading on futures after a couple of months? Why do some get listed immediately and others don’t? That’s the question.

I really don’t even want to get rich—I want to reduce risks, understanding that, for example, five coins might follow the same scenario. You can buy each coin for $20, and that’s not a myth—one could get you $200 or even $1000; it’s just that the real question here is patience and greed.

It seemed to me that GRVT could go the same way—everything lined up—but the project itself can’t sustain the hype. As it turned out, it’s an exchange token. A lot of coins were given out via airdrops and more will be soon, which will grind the price down below rock bottom.

I also consider it important where the project hides behind a “project,” meaning: on paper everything looks beautiful, but in reality it’s not working—more like a prototype. Still, that’s pretty much an ideal setup for the hype.

Another detail I notice: the PR doesn’t start at the beginning of the growth, but somewhere in the middle or closer to the end—so the crowd buys while the team sells their tokens.

Let’s take BTW—it doesn’t follow the scheme at all, but it’s growing right before our eyes, and I didn’t understand what was wrong at first. Then I figured it out: since the listing date, Binance has been running active contests all the time. That’s the secret, of course—not that it participated in contests alone, I’ll find about 10 coins like that for you. Some grew only a little, some dropped, but one good purchase can more than cover 10 failed ones, with plenty to spare.

One more detail: it doesn’t work everywhere, but I understood it specifically after a close, detailed look at LAB. If at the time of listing, a large number of coins are unlocked for marketing, the community, and all that junk—while investors won’t get their share until much later—then maybe they’ll get “thrown under the bus.” And it’s not just one coin that already showed this. To be precise, they won’t be completely thrown out; they’ll likely be in a small profit. But the team will earn more. The same LAB showed a peak of about $20+, then it fell, and only after the price was around $0.5 did investors get their first piece. But I’ll tell you this: at the first unlock, they could almost fully recoup their investments, even though they were treated very harshly with it.

So you need to look at any coin from the perspective of: who benefits and how much—how strongly is it profitable?

This is how a “so-called analyst” tries to figure out a big business and thinks that something will work out for him (that’s what I mean about myself). I hope so, of course—we’ll see what comes out. Even if nothing, at least I’ll upgrade my knowledge a bit.

Crypto is, in 85% of cases, a business that wants to profit from ordinary people. I honestly see a parallel with MMM. Look for yourself: every project praises itself and tells you to invest money in it, and then it cashes out our money with dump trucks 😂

It seems DOS could be a similar high-flying project, but you need to study the essence of the project itself. With GRVT I also got that impression, but there’s a 65% chance there’s nothing to catch there.

I’d be interested to see your observations, so if you noticed anything, tell me—maybe it will help put together this tricky puzzle with 1000+ pieces.