Seeing the news that Trump said AI won’t face mandatory regulation and that instead, voluntary audits will be used, the group chat has been quite lively today. Some people say this is a major positive for the AI sector, while others say that since nobody’s regulating it, things will grow wildly.
After trading for so many years, I’ve noticed a particularly interesting pattern: every time this kind of policy comes out—whether it’s loosened or tightened—the market’s first reaction is always to interpret it in the most optimistic or the most pessimistic way. In the end, both sides are often wrong. When regulation is loosened, people think the industry will take off and the related stocks will jump a bit; after a couple of months, when things unfold, they develop the same way as before, and the ones that were just riding on buzzword concepts fall back again. When regulation is tightened, everyone panics, thinking the industry is finished; but the companies that actually have real businesses, instead, use that phase to shake competitors out.
For my own part, my attitude toward policy news is pretty simple now: just know that something like this exists, and don’t chase the first reaction to trade short-term. Whether it’s mandatory regulation or voluntary audits, the companies that can ultimately break through are definitely the ones whose products are genuinely used by people and whose revenue can truly be built. The short-term relationship to how loose or strict the policy is matters much less.
You can pay more attention to the real implementation actions that follow policies like this. Don’t get carried away just because you see a headline. Do you think the AI industry should be regulated more strictly, or would it be better to let companies audit themselves like this? Let’s discuss in the comments.
$BTC
#特朗普拒绝AI监管改用自愿审计
After trading for so many years, I’ve noticed a particularly interesting pattern: every time this kind of policy comes out—whether it’s loosened or tightened—the market’s first reaction is always to interpret it in the most optimistic or the most pessimistic way. In the end, both sides are often wrong. When regulation is loosened, people think the industry will take off and the related stocks will jump a bit; after a couple of months, when things unfold, they develop the same way as before, and the ones that were just riding on buzzword concepts fall back again. When regulation is tightened, everyone panics, thinking the industry is finished; but the companies that actually have real businesses, instead, use that phase to shake competitors out.
For my own part, my attitude toward policy news is pretty simple now: just know that something like this exists, and don’t chase the first reaction to trade short-term. Whether it’s mandatory regulation or voluntary audits, the companies that can ultimately break through are definitely the ones whose products are genuinely used by people and whose revenue can truly be built. The short-term relationship to how loose or strict the policy is matters much less.
You can pay more attention to the real implementation actions that follow policies like this. Don’t get carried away just because you see a headline. Do you think the AI industry should be regulated more strictly, or would it be better to let companies audit themselves like this? Let’s discuss in the comments.
$BTC
#特朗普拒绝AI监管改用自愿审计