The hardest part of prediction markets isn’t coming up with questions—it’s ending the questions in a credible way.

On-chain prediction markets usually require result tokens, order matching, oracle adjudication, and final settlement to work together. A recent industry analysis from The Graph points out that market creation, order fills, dispute submissions, result confirmations, and fund redemptions all generate data. Even though these records are public, they still need to be correctly indexed and interpreted for users to understand the full process. The optimistic oracle workflow shown in the UMA documents includes result proposals, a challenge period, dispute handling, and final adjudication. This means that a credible prediction market can’t be just “Yes” or “No”—it must also clearly define the question, specify the deadline, state the information sources, define the dispute window, and set the settlement conditions. AnubisChain lists Prediction Markets as a focus area for ecosystem development. For developers, EVM compatibility solves the deployment issue; making adjudication rules readable, the process traceable, and the outcome verifiable is the foundation for building trust in prediction markets.