Have you noticed how quickly everyone accepted "forged requests, not stolen keys" as if that closed the book on the Bitget incident?
Most traders still sit on large $USDT stacks at exchanges because withdrawing is friction, then they scramble when a security story hits. You rarely get a clean signal on whether to exit until after the damage is already priced.
This is a case study, not a press release. Stolen keys means an attacker can authorize anything, while forged requests mean the system processed instructions that should never have been valid. Both can drain funds. The second just sounds cleaner in a statement, and people treated it as proof the vault was untouched.
Greed is sitting at 72 and nobody wants a security lecture while they hunt $SUI . What actually happened is an operational failure got rebranded as a technicality. Most $ETH holders did not change a single thing about where they keep coins.
Does that distinction change how you custody, or are we all going to forget this by next week?
#BitgetBreachForgedRequestsNotStolenKeys #BitgetSays
Most traders still sit on large $USDT stacks at exchanges because withdrawing is friction, then they scramble when a security story hits. You rarely get a clean signal on whether to exit until after the damage is already priced.
This is a case study, not a press release. Stolen keys means an attacker can authorize anything, while forged requests mean the system processed instructions that should never have been valid. Both can drain funds. The second just sounds cleaner in a statement, and people treated it as proof the vault was untouched.
Greed is sitting at 72 and nobody wants a security lecture while they hunt $SUI . What actually happened is an operational failure got rebranded as a technicality. Most $ETH holders did not change a single thing about where they keep coins.
Does that distinction change how you custody, or are we all going to forget this by next week?
#BitgetBreachForgedRequestsNotStolenKeys #BitgetSays
