The story of BB for me changed the moment the L1 paused. The project was trying to build its own CeDeFi environment, then a vulnerability appeared that allowed roughly 286.5 million BB to be withdrawn. After that, it was decided to halt the chain and move to the BNB Chain.
Here, specifically, I started looking at BounceBit differently. Sometimes we forcefully associate the term “L1” with power and sovereignty, but having the infrastructure also means owning all of its risks. Now the focus shifts more toward returns, RWA, and liquidity.
What I’m watching isn’t the promises—it’s whether this transition can create a simpler, more usable infrastructure than the previous one. Because the problem after an incident like this isn’t just technical; trust itself becomes part of the technology.
#BB @BounceBit #marouan47 #BinanceWillListHyperliquid(HYPE)
$BB
Here, specifically, I started looking at BounceBit differently. Sometimes we forcefully associate the term “L1” with power and sovereignty, but having the infrastructure also means owning all of its risks. Now the focus shifts more toward returns, RWA, and liquidity.
What I’m watching isn’t the promises—it’s whether this transition can create a simpler, more usable infrastructure than the previous one. Because the problem after an incident like this isn’t just technical; trust itself becomes part of the technology.
#BB @BounceBit #marouan47 #BinanceWillListHyperliquid(HYPE)
$BB
