Do we have to rewrite everything every time the payment system connects a new chain?
On September 22, the Stellar official website announced: BVNK has integrated Stellar into its stablecoin payment platform. Businesses can use this network through their existing single API, without building an additional on-chain connection.
What I care about is whether the maintenance burden can be reduced. The announcement also says that more Stellar native assets will be gradually added, so “the network is connected” shouldn’t be read as “all assets can be used.” Next, we should look at the specific supported asset list, the regions where collections are accepted, and the reconciliation process after funds are received—not just how many chains are connected.
When you handle cross-border collections, is the bigger effort the integration, or the reconciliation?$XLM #Stellar enterprise payments
On September 22, the Stellar official website announced: BVNK has integrated Stellar into its stablecoin payment platform. Businesses can use this network through their existing single API, without building an additional on-chain connection.
What I care about is whether the maintenance burden can be reduced. The announcement also says that more Stellar native assets will be gradually added, so “the network is connected” shouldn’t be read as “all assets can be used.” Next, we should look at the specific supported asset list, the regions where collections are accepted, and the reconciliation process after funds are received—not just how many chains are connected.
When you handle cross-border collections, is the bigger effort the integration, or the reconciliation?$XLM #Stellar enterprise payments
