Trump appears deranged, yet he helped the United States complete a strategic transition. For a great power to accomplish a structural strategic transition is an extraordinarily, extraordinarily difficult thing. To this day, countries around the world drag their feet—only Trump punctured that layer of window film.
He dares to break the set of ally rules the United States has formed over the long term. In the past, the U.S. placed greater emphasis on the alliance system, shared interests, and long-established order.
Trump is more direct: he doesn’t talk about feelings—he talks about capital.
His logic is a kind of “big capital repatriation spell.” If global capital wants to enter the United States, it must stay; if U.S. capital wants to run outward, it’s brought back by whatever means.
It’s the same externally and internally. Those tech giants and capital giants are each one dragged onto the table.
Don’t keep the money in your pockets. Either invest in the U.S., or continue bearing higher policy costs.
This isn’t the traditional sense of “catering to capital.” Instead, it turns capital directly into fuel for U.S. economic growth.
In the end, what Trump wants isn’t to make capital like the United States, but to make capital unable to leave.
So his roster of supporters almost covers the elite system of every industry in the U.S.
How is this not a kind of “imperial will”? Most countries around the world wouldn’t choose “to cut off a limb to survive.” More often, they rely on momentum for development and on past successful experience, step by step, walking toward decline.
For example, Europe today and the Greater Russia… the inertia of Cold War thinking continues to this day.
And what Bessent said—“With AI, you can’t see Europe on the table”—isn’t really satire.
It’s reality.
$BTC $ETH #btc #eth
He dares to break the set of ally rules the United States has formed over the long term. In the past, the U.S. placed greater emphasis on the alliance system, shared interests, and long-established order.
Trump is more direct: he doesn’t talk about feelings—he talks about capital.
His logic is a kind of “big capital repatriation spell.” If global capital wants to enter the United States, it must stay; if U.S. capital wants to run outward, it’s brought back by whatever means.
It’s the same externally and internally. Those tech giants and capital giants are each one dragged onto the table.
Don’t keep the money in your pockets. Either invest in the U.S., or continue bearing higher policy costs.
This isn’t the traditional sense of “catering to capital.” Instead, it turns capital directly into fuel for U.S. economic growth.
In the end, what Trump wants isn’t to make capital like the United States, but to make capital unable to leave.
So his roster of supporters almost covers the elite system of every industry in the U.S.
How is this not a kind of “imperial will”? Most countries around the world wouldn’t choose “to cut off a limb to survive.” More often, they rely on momentum for development and on past successful experience, step by step, walking toward decline.
For example, Europe today and the Greater Russia… the inertia of Cold War thinking continues to this day.
And what Bessent said—“With AI, you can’t see Europe on the table”—isn’t really satire.
It’s reality.
$BTC $ETH #btc #eth
