In essence, this whole thing is being stirred up by those who haven’t lost money. I really don’t want to keep bringing it up. Even people who weren’t involved in this matter have been lighting fires in that group all along. A few ended up being used as targets by others—being treated like a tool, used by others.
Me distributing/sending out coins isn’t a reason to attack me. Tell me—when have I ever not said it in the group that I’m going to distribute? People in the group go to pick up the chips. The problem is: after I sell, I keep pulling the order book, but instead it’s the profitable people in your group who keep selling. That’s why later I basically didn’t dare to say anything in the group about me providing liquidity, for fear this would happen. I pull the price up, they dump it—pulling it from 36 down to 5. And those in the group just stare at my few cents. When I pull, I end up becoming their liquidity. That’s how the crypto world is—everyone’s got all kinds. Some genuinely want to build something; that part is true. But some people are specifically watching group messages to trade swings, and even they said it themselves in the group.
As the market later moved downward, the essence was still panic. Their own group friends were dumping. Once it hit 40-something? What meaning is there in insisting on holding on? A handful of scattered sand with no consensus—that’s the reason I liquidated around 2 a.m. at the lowest point. So on this matter, I haven’t done wrong by myself in terms of my character or my initial intention to build. You yourselves know it—there are informants and bad people in the group. Do I need to say more? I already said: basically, the ones jumping the hardest in the group are the ones who haven’t lost money.
As for the “scam coin / shitcoin” matter, I didn’t do anything wrong. The only mistake I made was playing this shitcoin. I didn’t stick with it—but I haven’t made the wrong choice otherwise. At the beginning, most people were making money. Sister 1 even retweeted on Twitter, and by the third day it was trending. Essentially, everyone had made profits. The problem is: once they made money, they didn’t withdraw their principal; when they lost money, they came to blame me. That’s not how you do things.
Today, I lost money while leading trades with my contract. That’s my problem, and I don’t need compensation. Sometimes I’ll even compensate loyal old-school fans with half. But this is a separate issue from contract-leading trades.
For the real loyal fans who truly lost money, I have a plan. I got started in contracts. If you’re willing, I can take you to trade contracts—I open the position, and you follow along. Use contracts to trade back the principal. If later, the money you follow mine still loses and you get liquidated, I’m very willing to compensate you with half. Of course, if we profit, I won’t ask you for even a penny.
I’ve always lived by the rule in contracts: win or lose, you take it.
Me distributing/sending out coins isn’t a reason to attack me. Tell me—when have I ever not said it in the group that I’m going to distribute? People in the group go to pick up the chips. The problem is: after I sell, I keep pulling the order book, but instead it’s the profitable people in your group who keep selling. That’s why later I basically didn’t dare to say anything in the group about me providing liquidity, for fear this would happen. I pull the price up, they dump it—pulling it from 36 down to 5. And those in the group just stare at my few cents. When I pull, I end up becoming their liquidity. That’s how the crypto world is—everyone’s got all kinds. Some genuinely want to build something; that part is true. But some people are specifically watching group messages to trade swings, and even they said it themselves in the group.
As the market later moved downward, the essence was still panic. Their own group friends were dumping. Once it hit 40-something? What meaning is there in insisting on holding on? A handful of scattered sand with no consensus—that’s the reason I liquidated around 2 a.m. at the lowest point. So on this matter, I haven’t done wrong by myself in terms of my character or my initial intention to build. You yourselves know it—there are informants and bad people in the group. Do I need to say more? I already said: basically, the ones jumping the hardest in the group are the ones who haven’t lost money.
As for the “scam coin / shitcoin” matter, I didn’t do anything wrong. The only mistake I made was playing this shitcoin. I didn’t stick with it—but I haven’t made the wrong choice otherwise. At the beginning, most people were making money. Sister 1 even retweeted on Twitter, and by the third day it was trending. Essentially, everyone had made profits. The problem is: once they made money, they didn’t withdraw their principal; when they lost money, they came to blame me. That’s not how you do things.
Today, I lost money while leading trades with my contract. That’s my problem, and I don’t need compensation. Sometimes I’ll even compensate loyal old-school fans with half. But this is a separate issue from contract-leading trades.
For the real loyal fans who truly lost money, I have a plan. I got started in contracts. If you’re willing, I can take you to trade contracts—I open the position, and you follow along. Use contracts to trade back the principal. If later, the money you follow mine still loses and you get liquidated, I’m very willing to compensate you with half. Of course, if we profit, I won’t ask you for even a penny.
I’ve always lived by the rule in contracts: win or lose, you take it.